Tea Štimac

17 papers receiving 274 citations

Peers

Tea Štimac
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 76
  • Hepatology 30
  • Surgery 119
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 50
  • Oncology 69
Replace Ahmed M. Elsabbagh with:
Ahmed M. Elsabbagh United States
N. W. Struthers Canada
Xietong Wang China
H Wilms Germany
Juhani S. Koskinen Finland
For Tai Lam United Kingdom
H.F. McAndrew United Kingdom
J. Erhard Germany
G. Rencoret Chile
Charlotte Frise United Kingdom
Tea Štimac relative to Ahmed M. Elsabbagh United States Ahmed M. Elsabbagh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.9×
Ahmed M. Elsabbagh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tea Štimac

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tea Štimac's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tea Štimac with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tea Štimac more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tea Štimac

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tea Štimac. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tea Štimac. The network helps show where Tea Štimac may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tea Štimac, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tea Štimac Line = papers co-authored together Tea Štimac links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 201879
2 201975
3 201136
4 201923
5 201716
6 200111
7 20128
8
Molecular analysis in diagnostic procedure of hearing impairment in newborns.
20057
9 20135
10 20245
11 20125
12
Omeprazole, azithromycin and amoxicillin or amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid in eradication of Helicobacter pylori in duodenal ulcer disease.
19985
13 20193
14 20203
15 20222
16 20181
17
MATURE CD83+ DENDRITIC CELLS ACTIVATE DECIDUAL NK CELLS
20061
18 20250

About Tea Štimac

Tea Štimac is a scholar working on Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 18 papers that have together received 285 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (5 papers), Pregnancy and Medication Impact (4 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (3 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (3 papers), Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments (3 papers), Hemophilia Treatment and Research (2 papers), Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments (2 papers) and Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (76 citations), Hepatology (30 citations), Surgery (119 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (50 citations) and Oncology (69 citations). Tea Štimac has collaborated with scholars based in Croatia, Denmark and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Davor Štimac, Christian Gluud, Giovanni Casazza, Dimitrinka Nikolova, Sandra Milić, Ivana Mikolašević, Ivan Jakopčić, Irena Hrstić, Igor Prpić and Oleg Petrović. Their work appears in journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Journal of Clinical Medicine, Current Allergy and Asthma Reports, European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology and Journal of Perinatal Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact