Tea Galić

27 papers receiving 309 citations

Peers

Tea Galić
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Emergency Medical Services 69
  • Periodontics 29
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 40
  • Physiology 114
  • Oral Surgery 18
Replace Riitta Pahkala with:
Riitta Pahkala Finland
Kanji Nohara Japan
Mehmet Külekçi Türkiye
Akira Nishiyama Japan
Banu Çakırer Türkiye
Rose D. Sheats United States
Cheerasook Chongkolwatana Thailand
Barbara Crippa Italy
Sylvester G. Ramirez United States
N. L. Кunelskaya Russia
Tea Galić relative to Riitta Pahkala Finland Riitta Pahkala's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
Riitta Pahkala · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tea Galić

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tea Galić's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tea Galić with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tea Galić more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tea Galić

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tea Galić. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tea Galić. The network helps show where Tea Galić may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tea Galić, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tea Galić Line = papers co-authored together Tea Galić links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201851
2 201842
3 201629
4 201525
5 201622
6 201619
7 201816
8 201614
9 201814
10 201714
11 201813
12 202012
13 202110
14 20228
15 20215
16 20233
17 20193
18 20193
19 20232
20 20232

About Tea Galić

Tea Galić is a scholar working on Physiology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Emergency Medical Services, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Molecular Biology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 314 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (7 papers), Sports Performance and Training (4 papers), Dental Trauma and Treatments (3 papers), Children's Physical and Motor Development (3 papers), dental development and anomalies (2 papers), Physical Education and Training Studies (2 papers), Dental Health and Care Utilization (2 papers) and Sports injuries and prevention (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medical Services (69 citations), Periodontics (29 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (40 citations), Physiology (114 citations) and Oral Surgery (18 citations). Tea Galić has collaborated with scholars based in Croatia, United States and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Frequent co-authors include Joško Božić, Zoran Đogaš, Daniela Šupe‐Domić, Tina Tičinović Kurir, Tina Poklepović Peričić, Ivan Galić, Josip A. Borovac, Renata Pecotić, Maja Valić and Ivana Medvedec Mikić. Their work appears in journals such as Sleep And Breathing, Dental Traumatology, Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, BMC Oral Health and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact