Tansen Sen

669 citations
24 papers · 215 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

    • Chinese history and philosophy 13
    • Asian Studies and History 5
    • Colonial History and Postcolonial Studies 3
    • Global Maritime and Colonial Histories 10
    • Eurasian Exchange Networks 4

Tansen Sen

22 papers receiving 156 citations

Peers

Tansen Sen
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Anthropology 93
  • Religious studies 30
  • Cultural Studies 31
  • Sociology and Political Science 153
  • Geography, Planning and Development 15
Replace Marina Carter with:
Marina Carter United Kingdom
J. R. Oldfield United Kingdom
Sebouh David Aslanian United States
Léonard Blussé Netherlands
G. V. Scammell United States
Tonio Andrade United States
Hermann Kulke Germany
James H. Sweet United States
Kenneth J. Andrien United States
Janet Moore Lindman United States
Tansen Sen relative to Marina Carter United Kingdom Marina Carter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Marina Carter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tansen Sen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tansen Sen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tansen Sen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tansen Sen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tansen Sen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tansen Sen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tansen Sen. The network helps show where Tansen Sen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside Tansen Sen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tansen Sen Line = papers co-authored together Tansen Sen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Buddhism, Diplomacy, and Trade: The Realignment of Sino-Indian Relations, 600-1400
200371
2 200628
3 201717
4 201011
5 201611
6 200210
7 20147
8 20117
9 20236
10 20016
11 19956
12 20125
13 20215
14 20195
15 20124
16
Traditional China in Asian and World History
20124
17 20144
18 20193
19 20221
20 19961

About Tansen Sen

Tansen Sen is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology, Religious studies, Political Science and International Relations and Philosophy, having authored 24 papers that have together received 215 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (13 papers), Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (10 papers), Indian and Buddhist Studies (8 papers), Asian Studies and History (5 papers), Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (4 papers), Eurasian Exchange Networks (4 papers), Indian History and Philosophy (3 papers) and Colonial History and Postcolonial Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (93 citations), Religious studies (30 citations), Cultural Studies (31 citations), Sociology and Political Science (153 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (15 citations). Tansen Sen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Singapore and China. Frequent co-authors include Victor H. Mair. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Asian Studies, Journal of world history, Asian Studies Review, Modern Asian Studies and T oung Pao.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact