Tai‐Won Um

1.2k citations
65 papers · 802 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Tai‐Won Um

60 papers receiving 763 citations

Peers

Tai‐Won Um
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Computer Networks and Communications 457
  • Information Systems 321
  • Artificial Intelligence 198
  • Signal Processing 46
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 68
Replace Muhammad Ibrahim with:
Muhammad Ibrahim Pakistan
Ioanna Roussaki Greece
Feras M. Awaysheh Estonia
Bibudhendu Pati India
Chhabi Rani Panigrahi India
Mahmoud Barhamgi France
Tereza Cristina Melo de Brito Carvalho Brazil
Mohammad Tabrez Quasim Saudi Arabia
Hongji Yang United Kingdom
Munesh Chandra Trivedi India
Tai‐Won Um relative to Muhammad Ibrahim Pakistan Muhammad Ibrahim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Muhammad Ibrahim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tai‐Won Um

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tai‐Won Um's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tai‐Won Um with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tai‐Won Um more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tai‐Won Um

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tai‐Won Um. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tai‐Won Um. The network helps show where Tai‐Won Um may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tai‐Won Um, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tai‐Won Um Line = papers co-authored together Tai‐Won Um links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018166
2 201650
3 201735
4 202133
5 201732
6 201531
7 201828
8 202027
9 202022
10
Classification of N-Screen Services and its standardization
201222
11 201721
12 201419
13 202018
14 202116
15
A Survey on Trust Computation in the Internet of Things
201615
16 201713
17 201613
18 202312
19 201912
20 202412

About Tai‐Won Um

Tai‐Won Um is a scholar working on Computer Networks and Communications, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Information Systems, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 65 papers that have together received 802 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include IoT and Edge/Fog Computing (13 papers), Advanced Optical Network Technologies (10 papers), Caching and Content Delivery (9 papers), Blockchain Technology Applications and Security (8 papers), Optical Network Technologies (8 papers), Cloud Computing and Resource Management (6 papers), Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data (6 papers) and Software-Defined Networks and 5G (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Networks and Communications (457 citations), Information Systems (321 citations), Artificial Intelligence (198 citations), Signal Processing (46 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (68 citations). Tai‐Won Um has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea, United Kingdom and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include Gyu Myoung Lee, Upul Jayasinghe, Qi Shi, Nguyen B. Truong, Muhammad Waleed, Jun Kyun Choi, Bo Zhou, Won Ryu, Aftab Khan and Tariq Kamal. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Access, Electronics, ETRI Journal, Applied Sciences and Sensors.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact