T. Peterson

1.8k citations
93 papers · 897 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

T. Peterson

84 papers receiving 873 citations

Peers

T. Peterson
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 206
  • Aerospace Engineering 155
  • Condensed Matter Physics 70
  • Plant Science 195
  • Biochemistry 28
Replace Voitech Stankevič with:
Voitech Stankevič Lithuania
S. Dutta Gupta India
Amartya Banerjee India
Toshiharu Takahashi Japan
Marı́a del Mar Sánchez-López Spain
Geoffrey W. Brown United States
Albert Redo-Sanchez United States
Qian Yu China
Flavio Giacomozzi Italy
Hiroki Koike Japan
T. Peterson relative to Voitech Stankevič Lithuania Voitech Stankevič's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×28×
Voitech Stankevič · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by T. Peterson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T. Peterson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. Peterson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. Peterson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T. Peterson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. Peterson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. Peterson. The network helps show where T. Peterson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside T. Peterson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with T. Peterson Line = papers co-authored together T. Peterson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 93 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003120
2 201398
3 199661
4 199852
5 201940
6 201932
7 202030
8 202028
9 200228
10 196321
11 196219
12 200317
13 201117
14 202316
15 198616
16 202015
17 202214
18 200214
19 201912
20 200312

About T. Peterson

T. Peterson is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Condensed Matter Physics, having authored 93 papers that have together received 897 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Superconducting Materials and Applications (50 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (39 papers), Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers (24 papers), Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies (16 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (15 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (6 papers), Advanced Memory and Neural Computing (5 papers) and ZnO doping and properties (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (206 citations), Aerospace Engineering (155 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (70 citations), Plant Science (195 citations) and Biochemistry (28 citations). T. Peterson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Surinder Chopra, Prasanna Athma, Cizhong Jiang, Jian‐Ping Wang, Jianying Gu, Xun Gu, Dawn P. Coe, D. H. Tomboulian, Mahendra DC and Delin Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Cryogenics, Applied Physics Letters, Advanced Functional Materials and Journal of Applied Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact