Stuart Pierson

892 citations
19 papers · 144 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Stuart Pierson

12 papers receiving 86 citations

Peers

Stuart Pierson
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • History and Philosophy of Science 18
  • Theoretical Computer Science 4
  • Philosophy 21
  • History 19
  • Sociology and Political Science 72
Replace Frederick B. Artz with:
Frederick B. Artz United States
Richard H. Weisberg United States
Peter Jelavich United States
Jean Lacouture
Christian Delporte France
James P. Gilroy
James H. Billington United States
Hermann Lübbe Switzerland
Paul Hazard
Marjorie Lamberti United States
Stuart Pierson relative to Frederick B. Artz United States Frederick B. Artz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Frederick B. Artz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stuart Pierson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stuart Pierson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuart Pierson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuart Pierson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stuart Pierson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuart Pierson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuart Pierson. The network helps show where Stuart Pierson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Stuart Pierson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stuart Pierson Line = papers co-authored together Stuart Pierson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 198356
2 198533
3 200016
4 20008
5 19848
6 19994
7
Johnston's Smallwood
19983
8 19933
9 19693
10 19743
11 19762
12
The Afterlife of George Cartwright . John Steffler.
19921
13 19941
14
Medieval Survivals: Reflections on Ron Hynes, cryer's paradise
19971
15 19971
16 19831
17
The Shipping News . E. Annie Proulx.
19950
18 19950
19 19840

About Stuart Pierson

Stuart Pierson is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, having authored 19 papers that have together received 144 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History of Science and Medicine (3 papers), Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies (2 papers), Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (1 paper), Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (1 paper), History and advancements in chemistry (1 paper), Canadian Identity and History (1 paper), Origins and Evolution of Life (1 paper) and European history and politics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (18 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (4 citations), Philosophy (21 citations), History (19 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (72 citations). Stuart Pierson has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Russia and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Gregor McLennan, William H. Alexander, Bill Albert, David Alexander, Arthur P. Molella, James E. Brittain and Nathan Reingold. Their work appears in journals such as Labour / Le Travail, Perspectives on Science, Isis, Technology and Culture and The Economic History Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact