Stuart G. Ball

780 citations
16 papers · 403 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Stuart G. Ball

16 papers receiving 372 citations

Peers

Stuart G. Ball
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Ecological Modeling 131
  • Insect Science 125
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 167
  • Ecology 175
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 82
Replace Marzena Stańska with:
Marzena Stańska Poland
Sabrina Clavijo‐Baquet Chile
Vicki L. Stokes Australia
Juhani Itämies Finland
Douglas A. Keinath United States
J. Buszko Poland
Hugo Robles Belgium
Giulia Magoga Italy
Emilio Pagani‐Núñez China
Ana Nieto United Kingdom
Stuart G. Ball relative to Marzena Stańska Poland Marzena Stańska's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Marzena Stańska · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stuart G. Ball

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stuart G. Ball's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuart G. Ball with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuart G. Ball more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stuart G. Ball

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuart G. Ball. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuart G. Ball. The network helps show where Stuart G. Ball may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stuart G. Ball, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stuart G. Ball Line = papers co-authored together Stuart G. Ball links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2019143
2 202189
3 198660
4 198731
5
Atlas of the hoverflies of Great Britain (diptera, syrphidae)
201117
6
Provisional atlas of British hoverflies (Diptera, Syrphidae)
200013
7
FIRST RECORDS OF EUDENDRIUM GLOMERATUM (CNIDARIA: HYDROIDA) IN BRITISH AND IRISH WATERS, AND TAXONOMIC COMMENTS
198711
8 19837
9 19847
10 19817
11 20235
12 19854
13
Britain's Hoverflies
20154
14
A review of the scarce and threatened flies of Great Britain. Part 6: Syrphidae.
20142
15 19942
16 20031

About Stuart G. Ball

Stuart G. Ball is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Ecology, Ecological Modeling and Genetics, having authored 16 papers that have together received 403 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diptera species taxonomy and behavior (8 papers), Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies (5 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (3 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (3 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (2 papers), Plant and animal studies (2 papers), Insect behavior and control techniques (2 papers) and Entomological Studies and Ecology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (131 citations), Insect Science (125 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (167 citations), Ecology (175 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (82 citations). Stuart G. Ball has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Roger Morris, Robert A. Barber, Francis Gilbert, M. D. Eyre, G. N. Foster, Myles H. M. Menz, Gao Hu, Jason W. Chapman, Karl R. Wotton and Boya Gao. Their work appears in journals such as Diversity and Distributions, Bulletin of Entomological Research, Current Biology, Veterinary Parasitology and Journal of Applied Ecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact