Steven T. Devor

62 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Steven T. Devor
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Equine 94
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 378
  • Rehabilitation 175
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 149
  • Cell Biology 259
Replace Nicole Fellmann with:
Nicole Fellmann France
Allan J Davie Australia
Russ Best New Zealand
Vilmar Baldissera Brazil
Claire Thomas France
Rod W. Fry Australia
Grant Landers Australia
Timothy J. Quinn United States
Hans-Joachim Appell Germany
W. Lormes Germany
Steven T. Devor relative to Nicole Fellmann France Nicole Fellmann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Nicole Fellmann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Steven T. Devor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steven T. Devor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven T. Devor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven T. Devor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steven T. Devor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven T. Devor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven T. Devor. The network helps show where Steven T. Devor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Steven T. Devor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Steven T. Devor Line = papers co-authored together Steven T. Devor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200498
2 200492
3 201484
4 200567
5 200464
6 200251
7 200349
8 201549
9 199946
10 201238
11 200337
12 200436
13 200434
14
Effects of functional electric stimulation cycle ergometry training on lower limb musculature in acute sci individuals.
200530
15 201528
16 201327
17 201526
18 200526
19 200426
20 200726

About Steven T. Devor

Steven T. Devor is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Cell Biology, Biomedical Engineering, Complementary and alternative medicine and Physiology, having authored 65 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Muscle metabolism and nutrition (18 papers), Sports Performance and Training (17 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (10 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (9 papers), Muscle Physiology and Disorders (6 papers), Exercise and Physiological Responses (6 papers), Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (5 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (94 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (378 citations), Rehabilitation (175 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (149 citations) and Cell Biology (259 citations). Steven T. Devor has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Serbia and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Mark A. Merrick, Timothy E. Kirby, Robert A. DiSilvestro, Janet Buckworth, Leah E. Robinson, Kenneth W. Hinchcliff, Timothy P. White, Chad D. Markert, John A. Faulkner and Matthew J. Garver. Their work appears in journals such as Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, Journal of Applied Physiology, International Journal of Sports Medicine and The Journals of Gerontology Series A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact