Steven R. Flom

33 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Steven R. Flom
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 361
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 285
  • Materials Chemistry 669
  • Biomedical Engineering 515
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 250
Replace Ekaterina Badaeva with:
Ekaterina Badaeva United States
M. Blanchard-Desce France
Sonja Lebus Germany
Claude Runser France
Peter V. Bedworth United States
J. Zyss France
Rebecca L. Gieseking United States
Gurmit S. Bahra United Kingdom
Józef Lipiński Poland
Md. Mehboob Alam India
Steven R. Flom relative to Ekaterina Badaeva United States Ekaterina Badaeva's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Ekaterina Badaeva · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Steven R. Flom

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steven R. Flom's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven R. Flom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven R. Flom more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steven R. Flom

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven R. Flom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven R. Flom. The network helps show where Steven R. Flom may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Steven R. Flom, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Steven R. Flom Line = papers co-authored together Steven R. Flom links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000264
2 1985188
3 200387
4 199079
5 198970
6 198654
7 199646
8 200543
9 198636
10 200635
11 201631
12 201526
13 199415
14 198514
15 199314
16 198812
17 200311
18 200210
19 19977
20 20157

About Steven R. Flom

Steven R. Flom is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Materials Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, having authored 34 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nonlinear Optical Materials Studies (19 papers), Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry (15 papers), Nonlinear Optical Materials Research (14 papers), Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (7 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (5 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (4 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (3 papers) and Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (361 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (285 citations), Materials Chemistry (669 citations), Biomedical Engineering (515 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (250 citations). Steven R. Flom has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Paul F. Barbara, James S. Shirk, Richard G. S. Pong, Michael Hanack, Heino Heckmann, Samson A. Jenekhe, Arthur W. Snow, V. Nagarajan, Wen‐Chang Chen and Eva M. Maya. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physical Chemistry, Optical Materials Express, Applied Physics Letters, Optics Express and The Journal of Physical Chemistry B.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact