Stephen Young

75 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Stephen Young
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 230
  • Ophthalmology 112
  • Public Administration 47
  • Anatomy 9
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 45
Replace Kim Collins with:
Kim Collins United States
Mehmet Akman Türkiye
Alexandra Krettek Sweden
Joseph M. Murphy United States
Sara A. Barton United States
Kohta Suzuki Japan
Jennifer Cote United States
Martin Smith South Africa
Nicola L. Hawley United States
George McMahon United Kingdom
Stephen Young relative to Kim Collins United States Kim Collins's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.9×
Kim Collins · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Young

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Young's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Young with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Young more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Young

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Young. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Young. The network helps show where Stephen Young may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Young, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Young Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Young links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 81 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015183
2 2011137
3 198080
4 201866
5 197654
6 200447
7 201443
8 198342
9 199538
10
Multinationals in retreat : the Scottish experience
198237
11 201634
12 201232
13 198829
14 199222
15 197721
16 201719
17 201519
18 200214
19 197313
20 197613

About Stephen Young

Stephen Young is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Plant Science and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 81 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Imaging in Medicine (9 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (8 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (7 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (5 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (5 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (4 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (3 papers) and Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (230 citations), Ophthalmology (112 citations), Public Administration (47 citations), Anatomy (9 citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (45 citations). Stephen Young has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include David W. Hill, Neil Hood, Gary M. Fox, David Walton, Joan C. Lo, Charles P. Quesenberry, Erica P. Gunderson, Yvonne Crites, Jun Kimura and Barbara Sternfeld. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Visual Communication in Medicine, Experimental Eye Research, The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society, Journal of World Trade and Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact