Stephen T. Moelter

1.4k citations
32 papers · 1.0k · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen T. Moelter

31 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Stephen T. Moelter
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 361
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 289
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 60
  • Family Practice 12
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 91
Replace Carla Ruis with:
Carla Ruis Netherlands
Joseph A. Kwentus United States
Frederick A. Struve United States
Vijay Venkatraman United States
Peter Raven United Kingdom
Jane Byrne United Kingdom
Hélène Beaunieux France
Einstein Francisco Camargos Brazil
Brian V. Shenal United States
Sabrina Danti Italy
Stephen T. Moelter relative to Carla Ruis Netherlands Carla Ruis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Carla Ruis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen T. Moelter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen T. Moelter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen T. Moelter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen T. Moelter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen T. Moelter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen T. Moelter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen T. Moelter. The network helps show where Stephen T. Moelter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen T. Moelter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen T. Moelter Line = papers co-authored together Stephen T. Moelter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012299
2 201990
3 200589
4 201072
5 200371
6 200264
7 201361
8 200847
9 201838
10 201228
11 202027
12 200125
13 201422
14 201015
15 200514
16 201610
17 20029
18 20189
19 20238
20 20016

About Stephen T. Moelter

Stephen T. Moelter is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Physiology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Rehabilitation, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (5 papers), Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (4 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (3 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (2 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (2 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (2 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (361 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (289 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (60 citations), Family Practice (12 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (91 citations). Stephen T. Moelter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Paul J. Moberg, Sharon X. Xie, Steven E. Arnold, David R. Roalf, David A. Wolk, Ruben C. Gur, Raquel E. Gur, J. Daniel Ragland, Steven J. Siegel and Bárbara Riegel. Their work appears in journals such as Neuropsychology, Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, Alzheimer s & Dementia, Schizophrenia Research and Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact