Stephen Seiler

781 citations
44 papers · 470 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Seiler

37 papers receiving 461 citations

Peers

Stephen Seiler
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Cancer Research 142
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 168
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 101
  • Radiation 34
  • Health Informatics 4
Replace Christiane Marx with:
Christiane Marx Germany
Rosina Ahmed India
L. M. Porfiri Italy
Eric Whitacre United States
Sally Goudreau United States
Tami Karni Israel
Lauren Friedlander United States
Markus Müller‐Schimpfle Germany
Jocelyn A. Rapelyea United States
Alice Rim United States
Stephen Seiler relative to Christiane Marx Germany Christiane Marx's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.7×
Christiane Marx · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Seiler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Seiler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Seiler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Seiler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Seiler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Seiler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Seiler. The network helps show where Stephen Seiler may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Seiler, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Seiler Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Seiler links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201570
2 201750
3 201749
4 201847
5 202044
6 202322
7 201721
8 201718
9 201417
10 201512
11 202210
12 20209
13 20169
14 20229
15 20179
16 20208
17 20187
18 20237
19 20237
20 20216

About Stephen Seiler

Stephen Seiler is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Surgery, having authored 44 papers that have together received 470 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (14 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (9 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (7 papers), Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (7 papers), MRI in cancer diagnosis (6 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (6 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (5 papers) and AI in cancer detection (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (142 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (168 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (101 citations), Radiation (34 citations) and Health Informatics (4 citations). Stephen Seiler has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Sally Goudreau, Xuejun Gu, Jochen Keupp, Weiguo Lu, Elena Vinogradov, Erlei Zhang, Ramapriya Ganti, Robert E. Lenkinski, Sunati Sahoo and Ann Spangler. Their work appears in journals such as Radiographics, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, American Journal of Roentgenology, European Journal of Radiology and The Breast Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact