Stephen Ramsay

898 citations
14 papers · 226 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Ramsay

12 papers receiving 178 citations

Peers

Stephen Ramsay
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Computer Science Applications 89
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 65
  • Literature and Literary Theory 55
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 37
  • Conservation 8
Replace Waverly Tseng with:
Waverly Tseng United States
Jozef Colpaert Belgium
Kevser Hava Türkiye
Yangyu Xiao China
Lung-Hsiang Wong Singapore
Janet Ainley United Kingdom
David B. Palumbo United States
Eva Norén Sweden
Jeffrey Maloney United States
Matthieu Quignard France
Stephen Ramsay relative to Waverly Tseng United States Waverly Tseng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Waverly Tseng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Ramsay

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Ramsay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Ramsay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Ramsay more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Ramsay

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Ramsay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Ramsay. The network helps show where Stephen Ramsay may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Ramsay, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Ramsay Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Ramsay links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1
Reading Machines: Toward an Algorithmic Criticism
201185
2 201338
3 201332
4 200924
5 201516
6
In Praise of Pattern
200510
7 20098
8
Transcending boundaries: Integrating people, processes and systems
20006
9 20174
10 19921
11 20171
12 20161
13 20220
14 20170

About Stephen Ramsay

Stephen Ramsay is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Computer Science Applications, Literature and Literary Theory, Communication and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 14 papers that have together received 226 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (4 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (4 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (2 papers), Digital Humanities and Scholarship (2 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (2 papers), South African History and Culture (1 paper), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (1 paper) and Polyomavirus and related diseases (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (89 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (65 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (55 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (37 citations) and Conservation (8 citations). Stephen Ramsay has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Duane F. Shell, Leen‐Kiat Soh, Brian R. Moore, Lee Miller, Stephen Scott, Ashok Samal, Etsuko N. Moriyama, George E. Meyer, Patrick Juola and Brian Herron. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, Communications of the ACM, Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS), ACM SIGCSE Bulletin and University of Illinois Press eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact