Stephen Paul

430 citations
25 papers · 345 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Paul

21 papers receiving 339 citations

Peers

Stephen Paul
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 300
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 54
  • Geophysics 26
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 29
  • Mechanics of Materials 40
Replace A. K. Avetissian with:
A. K. Avetissian Armenia
Michael Helle United States
T. K. Fang United States
K. Tsigutkin United States
R.-H. Rinkleff Germany
S. R. Mane United States
Cliff Thomas United States
M. J. Lim United States
Siliang Zeng China
Assaf Levanon Israel
Stephen Paul relative to A. K. Avetissian Armenia A. K. Avetissian's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
A. K. Avetissian · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Paul

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Paul's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Paul with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Paul more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Paul

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Paul. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Paul. The network helps show where Stephen Paul may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Paul, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Paul Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Paul links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200970
2 201049
3 201040
4 200840
5 200836
6 200921
7 200814
8 200014
9 199911
10 201010
11 19929
12 20046
13 20036
14 19994
15 20094
16 20063
17 20062
18 20052
19 19962
20 20021

About Stephen Paul

Stephen Paul is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Mechanics of Materials, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 25 papers that have together received 345 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atomic and Molecular Physics (15 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (9 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (7 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (6 papers), Magnetic confinement fusion research (6 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics (5 papers), Laser Design and Applications (3 papers) and Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (300 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (54 citations), Geophysics (26 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (29 citations) and Mechanics of Materials (40 citations). Stephen Paul has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Y. K. Ho, Ronald C. Davidson, Susan Lu, Huitian Lu, R. J. Fonck, Mark E. Thompson, R. Durst, T. S. Pedersen, Matthew E. Briggs and Dennis L. Paisley. Their work appears in journals such as Physics of Plasmas, Review of Scientific Instruments, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A Vacuum Surfaces and Films, Physical Review A and Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact