Stephen Lemos

971 citations
37 papers · 714 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

    • Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques 10
    • Shoulder Injury and Treatment 7
    • Muscle activation and electromyography studies 6

Stephen Lemos

37 papers receiving 677 citations

Peers

Stephen Lemos
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Rehabilitation 145
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 71
  • Surgery 337
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 27
  • Human-Computer Interaction 24
Replace D. Neuhaus with:
D. Neuhaus Germany
Hasan Toktaş Türkiye
David J. Nuckley United States
Michael D. Rooks United States
Jean‐Noël Goubier France
Mohamed Salaheldien Mohamed Alayat Saudi Arabia
Paul Seror France
Colin F. Moseley United States
Charles Sorbie Canada
Jens Dargel Germany
Stephen Lemos relative to D. Neuhaus Germany D. Neuhaus's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
D. Neuhaus · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Lemos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Lemos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Lemos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Lemos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Lemos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Lemos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Lemos. The network helps show where Stephen Lemos may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Lemos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Lemos Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Lemos links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004311
2 202053
3 200341
4 201732
5 202032
6 201827
7 202123
8 201322
9 201522
10 201520
11 201516
12 201315
13 202013
14 201211
15 201310
16 20207
17 20156
18 20176
19 20135
20 20135

About Stephen Lemos

Stephen Lemos is a scholar working on Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, Rehabilitation, Epidemiology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 37 papers that have together received 714 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (10 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (7 papers), Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries (6 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (6 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (5 papers), Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment (4 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (4 papers) and Sports injuries and prevention (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (145 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (71 citations), Surgery (337 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (27 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (24 citations). Stephen Lemos has collaborated with scholars based in United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Ronald S. Kvitne, Amanda O. Esquivel, Chaoyang Chen, Xiaodong Zhang, Clarence L. Shields, Guoxin Ni, Yang Zhou, Stephanie Muh, Christine Chen and Robert B. Kohen. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Sports Medicine, Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, Orthopedics, The Journal of Knee Surgery and Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact