Stephen L. Read

15 papers receiving 609 citations

Peers

Stephen L. Read
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Neurology 111
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 177
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 230
  • Neurology 138
  • Physiology 211
Replace E Gil-Néciga with:
E Gil-Néciga Spain
Pilar Santacruz Spain
Olaf Lenz Germany
F. Munz Germany
Shannon Buckley United States
Christoph Ritter Germany
Zhongxin Zhao China
M. Empl Germany
Stefano Delli Pizzi Italy
Barbara Dessi Italy
Stephen L. Read relative to E Gil-Néciga Spain E Gil-Néciga's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
E Gil-Néciga · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen L. Read

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen L. Read's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen L. Read with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen L. Read more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen L. Read

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen L. Read. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen L. Read. The network helps show where Stephen L. Read may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen L. Read, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen L. Read Line = papers co-authored together Stephen L. Read links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2000192
2 1994116
3 199596
4 198868
5 199664
6 198936
7 199932
8 199022
9
Pretreatment orthostatic hypotension in geriatric depression: predictor of response to imipramine and doxepin.
198320
10 198314
11 19938
12
Update on cholinergic enhancement therapy for Alzheimer disease.
19874
13 19843
14
Response to Dr. Schneider
19851
15 19841

About Stephen L. Read

Stephen L. Read is a scholar working on Physiology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Surgery, Neurology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 15 papers that have together received 677 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (2 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (2 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (2 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (2 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers), Cerebrovascular and genetic disorders (2 papers) and Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (111 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (177 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (230 citations), Neurology (138 citations) and Physiology (211 citations). Stephen L. Read has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Türkiye and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Bruce L. Miller, Jeffrey L. Cummings, Fred S. Mishkin, Diana Lenard Secor, Harry V. Vinters, Uwamie Tomiyasu, D. Frank Benson, Jeffrey L. Cummings, Hideo H. Itabashi and Ismaël Mena. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, Journal of neurosurgery, Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology and American Journal of Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact