Stephen Hogg
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Retinal and Optic Conditions
-
- Retinal Imaging and Analysis
Papers in
-
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments 6
- Retinal and Optic Conditions 4
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 2
- Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome 1
-
- Retinal Imaging and Analysis 8
- Co-authors
- Tom MacGillivray (12 shared papers)Emanuele Trucco (12 shared papers)Alex S. F. Doney (4 shared papers)Muthu Rama Krishnan Mookiah (2 shared papers)Vijayaraghavan Prathiba (2 shared papers)Viswanathan Mohan (2 shared papers)Rajendra Pradeepa (1 shared paper)Ranjit Mohan Anjana (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Scientific Reports (3 papers)Nuclear Medicine Communications (1 paper)Diabetes Care (1 paper)Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine (1 paper)Medical Image Analysis (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomFranceIndia
In The Last Decade
Stephen Hogg
13 papers receiving 243 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Ophthalmology 98
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 167
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 50
- Health Informatics 3
- Health Information Management 9
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Hogg
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Hogg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Hogg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Hogg more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Hogg
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Hogg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Hogg. The network helps show where Stephen Hogg may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Hogg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 108 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 24 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 23 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 20 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 12 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2025 | 0 |
About Stephen Hogg
Stephen Hogg is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Nephrology, Neurology and Polymers and Plastics, having authored 14 papers that have together received 249 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Imaging and Analysis (8 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (6 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (4 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (2 papers), Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (1 paper), Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics (1 paper), Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies (1 paper) and Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (98 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (167 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (50 citations), Health Informatics (3 citations) and Health Information Management (9 citations). Stephen Hogg has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and India. Frequent co-authors include Tom MacGillivray, Emanuele Trucco, Alex S. F. Doney, Muthu Rama Krishnan Mookiah, Vijayaraghavan Prathiba, Viswanathan Mohan, Rajendra Pradeepa, Ranjit Mohan Anjana, Ruixuan Wang and Gareth J. McKay. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Nuclear Medicine Communications, Diabetes Care, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine and Medical Image Analysis.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.