Stephen E. Heim
Impact in
-
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
- Surgery top 5%
- Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
- Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
- Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
- Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Papers in
-
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology 8
- Surgery 6
- Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty 3
- Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques 3
- Hip disorders and treatments 1
- Co-authors
- Thomas A. Zdeblick (4 shared papers)Harvinder S. Sandhu (4 shared papers)Scott D. Boden (2 shared papers)J. Kenneth Burkus (1 shared paper)Matthew F. Gornet (1 shared paper)Paul C. McAfee (1 shared paper)W. P. Geis (1 shared paper)George D. Picetti (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Orthopedic Clinics of North America (2 papers)Spine (2 papers)The Spine Journal (1 paper)Orthopedics (1 paper)Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Stephen E. Heim
9 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Stephen E. Heim's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 613
- Surgery 581
- Urology 79
- Oral Surgery 50
- Biomedical Engineering 322
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen E. Heim
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen E. Heim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen E. Heim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen E. Heim more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen E. Heim
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen E. Heim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen E. Heim. The network helps show where Stephen E. Heim may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 21 scholars most cited alongside Stephen E. Heim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Use of rhBMP-2 in Interbody Fusion Cages Hit paper breakdown → | 2000 | 582 |
| 2 | 1995 | 294 | |
| 3 | 2003 | 269 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 79 | |
| 5 | 1997 | 14 | |
| 6 | 2002 | 9 | |
| 7 | 2002 | 7 | |
| 8 | THE USE OF BMP-2 IN INTERBODY FUSION CAGES: DEFINITIVE EVIDENCE OF OSTEOINDUCTION IN HUMANS | 2002 | 3 |
| 9 | 1995 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2002 | 0 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 0 |
About Stephen E. Heim
Stephen E. Heim is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, Pharmacy and Media Technology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (8 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (3 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (3 papers), Medical Imaging and Analysis (2 papers), Advanced Image Fusion Techniques (1 paper), Healthcare Policy and Management (1 paper), Infrared Target Detection Methodologies (1 paper) and Hip disorders and treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (613 citations), Surgery (581 citations), Urology (79 citations), Oral Surgery (50 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (322 citations). Stephen E. Heim has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Thomas A. Zdeblick, Harvinder S. Sandhu, Scott D. Boden, J. Kenneth Burkus, Matthew F. Gornet, Paul C. McAfee, W. P. Geis, George D. Picetti, Ira L. Fedder and James Zuckerman. Their work appears in journals such as Orthopedic Clinics of North America, Spine, The Spine Journal, Orthopedics and Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.