Stephen Deets

450 citations
29 papers · 283 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Deets

28 papers receiving 237 citations

Peers

Stephen Deets
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Political Science and International Relations 154
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 19
  • Sociology and Political Science 91
  • Education 45
  • Linguistics and Language 5
Replace Rand Quinn with:
Rand Quinn United States
Manfred Stock Germany
AGUSTINA S. PAGLAYAN United States
Rosalina Ginting Indonesia
Catherine Béduwé France
Michele Rostan Italy
Juliane Achatz Germany
Floro Ernesto Caroleo Italy
Julien Barrier France
Josefina Erikson Sweden
Stephen Deets relative to Rand Quinn United States Rand Quinn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.3×
Rand Quinn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Deets

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Deets's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Deets with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Deets more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Deets

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Deets. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Deets. The network helps show where Stephen Deets may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Deets, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Deets Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Deets links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201733
2 200227
3 200526
4 200626
5 200625
6 200616
7 200916
8 200814
9 202014
10 201812
11 200610
12 20209
13 20239
14 20097
15 20085
16 20155
17
Jumping out of the "Hobbesian Fishbowl" and Into the Fire: Lebanon, Elections, and Chronic Crisis
20164
18 20224
19 20234
20 20223

About Stephen Deets

Stephen Deets is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Management of Technology and Innovation, Education and Urban Studies, having authored 29 papers that have together received 283 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Middle East Politics and Society (8 papers), Minority Rights and Languages (5 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (4 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (3 papers), Sustainability in Higher Education (3 papers), Political Theory and Democracy (2 papers), Management and Marketing Education (2 papers) and Political Conflict and Governance (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (154 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (19 citations), Sociology and Political Science (91 citations), Education (45 citations) and Linguistics and Language (5 citations). Stephen Deets has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Lebanon and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Karen Dawisha, Sherrill Stroschein, Vikki L. Rodgers, S. Sinan Erzurumlu, Danna N. Greenberg, James Hunt and Sarah Q. Foster. Their work appears in journals such as Ethnopolitics, East European Politics and Societies and Cultures, Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, Nations and Nationalism and Problems of Post-Communism.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact