Stephen D. Webb

36 papers receiving 340 citations

Peers

Stephen D. Webb
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Radiation 79
  • Numerical Analysis 24
  • Health 27
  • Sociology and Political Science 109
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 44
Replace Jean‐Michel Billette with:
Jean‐Michel Billette Canada
Hacer Alan Dikmen Türkiye
John C. Courtney United States
M. W. Reed Australia
Johan de Jong Netherlands
David W. Jordan United States
Sabine Theis Germany
Nick Clarke United Kingdom
Anthony J. Ferraro United States
Stephen D. Webb relative to Jean‐Michel Billette Canada Jean‐Michel Billette's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Jean‐Michel Billette · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen D. Webb

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen D. Webb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen D. Webb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen D. Webb more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen D. Webb

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen D. Webb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen D. Webb. The network helps show where Stephen D. Webb may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen D. Webb, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen D. Webb Line = papers co-authored together Stephen D. Webb links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010110
2 197239
3 201430
4 198025
5
New Zealand society;: Contemporary perspectives
197324
6 197619
7 197716
8 197816
9 197516
10 201112
11 200612
12 198010
13 197910
14 19868
15 19757
16 19807
17 20115
18 19763
19 20123
20 19763

About Stephen D. Webb

Stephen D. Webb is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Sociology and Political Science and Clinical Psychology, having authored 45 papers that have together received 402 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers (14 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (11 papers), Gyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research (6 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (4 papers), Policing Practices and Perceptions (3 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (2 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (2 papers) and Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiation (79 citations), Numerical Analysis (24 citations), Health (27 citations), Sociology and Political Science (109 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (44 citations). Stephen D. Webb has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Russia. Frequent co-authors include David L. Smith, John W. Collette, Ian P. Castro, Vladimir Litvinenko, F. Clemente, S. I. Voropayev, C. Nath, Richard S. Krannich, Gang Wang and H. J. S. Fernando. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Special Topics - Accelerators and Beams, American Journal of Sociology, Criminal Justice Review, Physics of Fluids and American Journal of Criminal Justice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact