Stephen D. Carrington

60 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Stephen D. Carrington
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Equine 46
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 354
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 226
  • Small Animals 125
  • Pharmaceutical Science 100
Replace Jody L. Gookin with:
Jody L. Gookin United States
Luke B. Borst United States
François Meurens France
Tomonori Nochi Japan
Neil Foster United Kingdom
Karen Campbell United States
Richard M. Gilley United States
James C. Wright United States
W.J.A. Boersma Netherlands
Thomas R. Tice United States
Stephen D. Carrington relative to Jody L. Gookin United States Jody L. Gookin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Jody L. Gookin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen D. Carrington

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen D. Carrington's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen D. Carrington with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen D. Carrington more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen D. Carrington

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen D. Carrington. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen D. Carrington. The network helps show where Stephen D. Carrington may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen D. Carrington, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen D. Carrington Line = papers co-authored together Stephen D. Carrington links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015189
2 2014185
3 2016110
4 200998
5 200884
6 201075
7 201975
8 199773
9 200559
10 201557
11 201051
12 201350
13 201348
14 201247
15 201243
16 200442
17 201241
18 201640
19 201639
20 200135

About Stephen D. Carrington

Stephen D. Carrington is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Agronomy and Crop Science, Organic Chemistry and Small Animals, having authored 61 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (19 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (13 papers), Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (10 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (9 papers), Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research (7 papers), Animal health and immunology (6 papers), Infant Nutrition and Health (5 papers) and Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (46 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (354 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (226 citations), Small Animals (125 citations) and Pharmaceutical Science (100 citations). Stephen D. Carrington has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan A. Lane, Rita M. Hickey, Anthony P. Corfield, Pauline M. Rudd, John V. Fahy, Karina V. Mariño, Sally J. Hicks, Sheena C. Kerr, Shaopeng Yuan and Mary E. Gallagher. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Reproduction, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Biochemical Society Transactions and Experimental Eye Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact