Stephen Casper
Impact in
- Health Informatics top 10%
Papers in
- Neurology 19
- Neurology and Historical Studies 19
- History of Medical Practice 10
-
- Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices 15
- Co-authors
- Dylan Hadfield-Menell (3 shared papers)Anson Ho (1 shared paper)L. S. Jacyna (2 shared papers)Hang Li (1 shared paper)Sijia Liu (1 shared paper)Michael Noetel (2 shared papers)Yang Liu (1 shared paper)Peter Slattery (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences (5 papers)Isis (4 papers)Medical History (3 papers)The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics (2 papers)Canadian Medical Association Journal (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Stephen Casper
38 papers receiving 302 citations
Stephen Casper's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Health Informatics 13
- General Psychology 12
- Neurology 53
- History 39
- Neurology 37
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Casper
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Casper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Casper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Casper more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Casper
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Casper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Casper. The network helps show where Stephen Casper may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Casper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 59 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 44 | |
| 3 | Rethinking machine unlearning for large language models Hit paper breakdown → | 2025 | 28 |
| 4 | 2018 | 22 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 20 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 12 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 10 | |
| 10 | The neurologists: A history of a medical specialty in modern Britain, c.1789–2000 | 2014 | 10 |
| 11 | 2013 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2008 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 8 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2010 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 18 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2021 | 3 |
About Stephen Casper
Stephen Casper is a scholar working on Neurology, Clinical Psychology, History, Neurology and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 51 papers that have together received 325 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurology and Historical Studies (19 papers), Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (15 papers), History of Medical Practice (10 papers), History of Medicine Studies (6 papers), History of Science and Medicine (6 papers), Medical History and Innovations (5 papers), Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) (5 papers) and Traumatic Brain Injury Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (13 citations), General Psychology (12 citations), Neurology (53 citations), History (39 citations) and Neurology (37 citations). Stephen Casper has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Dylan Hadfield-Menell, Anson Ho, L. S. Jacyna, Hang Li, Sijia Liu, Michael Noetel, Yang Liu, Peter Slattery, Xiaojun Xu and Rick Welsh. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, Isis, Medical History, The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics and Canadian Medical Association Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.