Stephen Bonner

53 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Stephen Bonner
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 178
  • Toxicology 50
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 43
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 42
  • Neurology 111
Replace Chris Wells with:
Chris Wells United States
H.H.M. Korsten Netherlands
Girish Dwivedi Australia
Hung‐Wen Chiu Taiwan
Rik Willems Belgium
Li-wei H. Lehman United States
Dukyong Yoon South Korea
Michel Dojat France
Thomas Heldt United States
S. Srinivasan India
Stephen Bonner relative to Chris Wells United States Chris Wells's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Chris Wells · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Bonner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Bonner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Bonner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Bonner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Bonner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Bonner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Bonner. The network helps show where Stephen Bonner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Bonner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Bonner Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Bonner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018189
2 2017124
3
A code of practice for the diagnosis and confirmation of death
2008110
4 201982
5 202277
6 201458
7 199751
8 200548
9 201742
10 202238
11 200538
12 200029
13 201429
14 199725
15
Style augmentation: data augmentation via style randomization
201921
16 200120
17 201317
18 200216
19 202116
20 201915

About Stephen Bonner

Stephen Bonner is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Surgery, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Molecular Biology, having authored 57 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Graph Neural Networks (8 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (5 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (5 papers), Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (5 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (5 papers), Organ Donation and Transplantation (5 papers), Cloud Computing and Resource Management (4 papers) and Scientific Computing and Data Management (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (178 citations), Toxicology (50 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (43 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (42 citations) and Neurology (111 citations). Stephen Bonner has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include John Brennan, A. Stephen McGough, Ian P. Barrett, Amir Atapour–Abarghouei, Ola Engkvist, Toby P. Breckon, Keith Hugill, Gareth Thomas, Simon Howell and William L. Hamilton. Their work appears in journals such as Anaesthesia, Journal of the Intensive Care Society, Neurosurgery, British Journal of Anaesthesia and Bioinformatics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact