Stephanie Both

66 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Stephanie Both
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 962
  • Clinical Psychology 514
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 291
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 58
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 309
Replace Kai-Lin Huang with:
Kai-Lin Huang Taiwan
Roberta Rossi Italy
Michelle Lipton United Kingdom
Louise Frisén Sweden
Gad Lubin Israel
Ira Haraldsen Norway
Melissa A. Farmer United States
Esther Gómez‐Gil Spain
Daniel Gérard France
Lara M. Wierenga Netherlands
Stephanie Both relative to Kai-Lin Huang Taiwan Kai-Lin Huang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Kai-Lin Huang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephanie Both

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephanie Both's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephanie Both with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephanie Both more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephanie Both

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephanie Both. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephanie Both. The network helps show where Stephanie Both may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephanie Both, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephanie Both Line = papers co-authored together Stephanie Both links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 68 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012140
2 2010118
3 2008114
4 2013100
5 201582
6 200381
7 201281
8 200476
9 200863
10 201361
11 201360
12 201058
13 201358
14 201656
15 201356
16 201954
17 201541
18 201941
19 200537
20 200736

About Stephanie Both

Stephanie Both is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 68 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sexual function and dysfunction studies (33 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (7 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (7 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (6 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (5 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (4 papers), Marriage and Sexual Relationships (4 papers) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (962 citations), Clinical Psychology (514 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (291 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (58 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (309 citations). Stephanie Both has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ellen Laan, Walter Everaerd, Nicole Y.L. Oei, Moniek M. ter Kuile, Serge A.R.B. Rombouts, Mark Spiering, Jacques van Lankveld, Joop van Gerven, David M. Cole and Christian F. Beckmann. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Sexual Medicine, Archives of Sexual Behavior, Human Reproduction, Fertility and Sterility and The Journal of Sex Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact