Stéphane Vial

35 papers receiving 264 citations

Peers

Stéphane Vial
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Applied Psychology 32
  • Human-Computer Interaction 30
  • Cultural Studies 37
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 11
  • Computer Networks and Communications 52
Replace Rachid Hourizi with:
Rachid Hourizi United Kingdom
Brendan Keogh Australia
Kelly Joyce United States
Sara Diamond Canada
Maxwell Foxman United States
Murat Tezer Cyprus
Ellen Lupton United States
Steve Collins United States
Graeme Kirkpatrick United Kingdom
Alex Wilkie United Kingdom
Stéphane Vial relative to Rachid Hourizi United Kingdom Rachid Hourizi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Rachid Hourizi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stéphane Vial

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stéphane Vial's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stéphane Vial with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stéphane Vial more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stéphane Vial

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stéphane Vial. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stéphane Vial. The network helps show where Stéphane Vial may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Stéphane Vial, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stéphane Vial Line = papers co-authored together Stéphane Vial links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202250
2 200125
3 201025
4 200222
5 201322
6 201915
7 201515
8 201514
9 201414
10 202210
11 20158
12 20237
13 20237
14 20146
15 20166
16
Manifeste pour le renouveau social et critique du design
20154
17
[Determination of target volume for dosimetric planning in stereotactic radiosurgery].
19974
18 19993
19 20143
20 19933

About Stéphane Vial

Stéphane Vial is a scholar working on Computer Networks and Communications, Cultural Studies, Mechanical Engineering, Sociology and Political Science and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 40 papers that have together received 288 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts (17 papers), Diverse multidisciplinary academic research (8 papers), Design Education and Practice (7 papers), Semiotics and Representation Studies (4 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (4 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (3 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers) and Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (32 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (30 citations), Cultural Studies (37 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (11 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (52 citations). Stéphane Vial has collaborated with scholars based in France, Canada and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include D. Gibon, J. Rousseau, Christian Vasseur, Nynke Tromp, Jean Rousseau, J. Caudrelier, B. Castelain, Charles Fournier, Bernard Coche‐Dequeant and Anne‐Françoise Audrain‐Pontevia. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, JMIR Mental Health, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Design Studies and IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact