Stéphane Cherix

41 papers receiving 963 citations

Peers

Stéphane Cherix
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Aging 21
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 43
  • Rheumatology 129
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 264
  • Hematology 93
Replace Shinji Tsukamoto with:
Shinji Tsukamoto Japan
Nayra Cárdenes United States
Hao Lü China
Yusuke Tsuda Japan
Bin Bai China
Ulrich Fischer‐Rasokat Germany
Jacopo Vannucci Italy
Ingo Melcher Germany
Shintaro Kuroda Japan
Lindsy J. Forbess United States
Stéphane Cherix relative to Shinji Tsukamoto Japan Shinji Tsukamoto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7×
Shinji Tsukamoto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stéphane Cherix

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stéphane Cherix's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stéphane Cherix with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stéphane Cherix more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stéphane Cherix

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stéphane Cherix. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stéphane Cherix. The network helps show where Stéphane Cherix may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stéphane Cherix, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stéphane Cherix Line = papers co-authored together Stéphane Cherix links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019179
2 2006155
3 202194
4 201465
5 202352
6 201041
7 200839
8 201539
9 201528
10 202028
11 201827
12 202025
13 201822
14 201421
15 201920
16 202018
17 202013
18 202313
19 201412
20 201911

About Stéphane Cherix

Stéphane Cherix is a scholar working on Rheumatology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Epidemiology and Oncology, having authored 43 papers that have together received 990 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments (10 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (9 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (3 papers), Soft tissue tumor case studies (3 papers), Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (2 papers), Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries (2 papers), Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (1 paper) and Cancer Cells and Metastasis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (21 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (43 citations), Rheumatology (129 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (264 citations) and Hematology (93 citations). Stéphane Cherix has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Hannes A. Rüdiger, Fabio Becce, Eugene T. Ek, Serge Leyvraz, Maurice Matter, Wassim Raffoul, Frédéric Peyrade, Christine Chevreau, Jean‐Yves Blay and Sophie Piperno‐Neumann. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Surgical Oncology, Cell Reports, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, Orthopaedics & Traumatology Surgery & Research and Science Advances.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact