Stephan Schraml

38 papers receiving 949 citations

Peers

Stephan Schraml
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 293
  • Automotive Engineering 179
  • Atmospheric Science 254
  • Computational Mechanics 284
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 172
Replace Minkyu Choi with:
Minkyu Choi United States
Nicolas Docquier Belgium
Md. Moinul Hossain United Kingdom
Ji Chen China
Ameya Joshi United States
Jianqing Huang China
Huang United States
Biao Zhang China
Takuya Kitamura Japan
Shuangxi Liu China
Stephan Schraml relative to Minkyu Choi United States Minkyu Choi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Minkyu Choi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephan Schraml

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephan Schraml's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephan Schraml with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephan Schraml more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephan Schraml

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephan Schraml. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephan Schraml. The network helps show where Stephan Schraml may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephan Schraml, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephan Schraml Line = papers co-authored together Stephan Schraml links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995155
2 1998120
3 2000109
4 199684
5 200670
6 201255
7 199942
8 201040
9 200733
10 201229
11 200025
12 201524
13 201023
14 200720
15 201419
16 200018
17 200718
18 201518
19 201216
20 201115

About Stephan Schraml

Stephan Schraml is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Aerospace Engineering and Automotive Engineering, having authored 38 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors (11 papers), Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies (9 papers), Advanced Memory and Neural Computing (7 papers), Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods (7 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (6 papers), Advanced Vision and Imaging (6 papers), Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization (5 papers) and Vehicle emissions and performance (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (293 citations), Automotive Engineering (179 citations), Atmospheric Science (254 citations), Computational Mechanics (284 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (172 citations). Stephan Schraml has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Stefan Will, Alfred Leipertz, Ahmed Nabil Belbachir, Peter Schön, Martin Litzenberger, Nenad Milošević, G. Gritsch, C. Posch, Ewa Piątkowska and Horst Bischof. Their work appears in journals such as SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series, Chemie Ingenieur Technik, Optics Letters, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics and Sensors.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact