Stella Watts

2.2k citations
10 papers · 1.0k · 1 hit paper · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Stella Watts

10 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Stella Watts's Hit Papers

A global test of the pollination syndrome hypothesis 2009 · 372 citations
3720+5+11Years since publication100200300

Peers

Stella Watts
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 973
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 443
  • Plant Science 709
  • Ecological Modeling 56
  • Insect Science 121
Replace Louise Cranmer with:
Louise Cranmer United Kingdom
Silvana Martén‐Rodríguez Mexico
Felipe Wanderley Amorim Brazil
Victoria Ferrero Spain
Hiroshi S. Ishii Japan
Martina Stang Netherlands
André Rodrigo Rech Brazil
Giovanni Scopece Italy
Matthew H. Koski United States
Santiago Benitez‐Vieyra Argentina
Stella Watts relative to Louise Cranmer United Kingdom Louise Cranmer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Louise Cranmer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stella Watts

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stella Watts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stella Watts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stella Watts more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stella Watts

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stella Watts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stella Watts. The network helps show where Stella Watts may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stella Watts, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stella Watts Line = papers co-authored together Stella Watts links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1
A global test of the pollination syndrome hypothesis
Hit paper breakdown →
2009372
2 2007253
3 2011127
4 201677
5 201265
6
Phenotype space and floral typology: towards an objective assessment of pollination syndromes
200039
7 201132
8 201229
9 201323
10 202212

About Stella Watts

Stella Watts is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Insect Science and Infectious Diseases, having authored 10 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (10 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (5 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (3 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (1 paper), Insect and Pesticide Research (1 paper), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (1 paper) and Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (973 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (443 citations), Plant Science (709 citations), Ecological Modeling (56 citations) and Insect Science (121 citations). Stella Watts has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Israel and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Jeff Ollerton, Ellen Lamborn, Rubén Alarcón, Mary V. Price, John T. Rotenberry, Louise Cranmer, Andrew B. Hingston, Nickolas M. Waser, Craig I. Peter and Ana M. Martín González. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Botany, PLoS ONE, Taxon, Flora and Journal of Pollination Ecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact