Stan Ruecker

86 papers receiving 427 citations

Peers

Stan Ruecker
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Literature and Literary Theory 150
  • Communication 81
  • Human-Computer Interaction 65
  • Conservation 29
  • Computer Science Applications 38
Replace Oya Y. Rieger with:
Oya Y. Rieger United States
Barbara H. Kwaśnik United States
Jon Rimmer United Kingdom
Youngok Choi United States
Karen Markey United States
Michael John Khoo United States
Gregory H. Leazer United States
Corinne Jörgensen United States
Constantinos Nicolaou Greece
Anne J. Gilliland‐Swetland United States
Stan Ruecker relative to Oya Y. Rieger United States Oya Y. Rieger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.8×
Oya Y. Rieger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stan Ruecker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stan Ruecker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stan Ruecker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stan Ruecker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stan Ruecker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stan Ruecker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stan Ruecker. The network helps show where Stan Ruecker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stan Ruecker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stan Ruecker Line = papers co-authored together Stan Ruecker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 97 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201067
2 201031
3 200730
4
Visual Interface Design for Digital Cultural Heritage: A Guide to Rich-Prospect Browsing
201123
5 200815
6 201013
7 200913
8 201312
9 200911
10 201111
11 201611
12 201710
13 201510
14 200810
15 20218
16 20208
17 20188
18 20118
19 20077
20 20147

About Stan Ruecker

Stan Ruecker is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Human-Computer Interaction, Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 97 papers that have together received 485 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Humanities and Scholarship (30 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (20 papers), Design Education and Practice (12 papers), Multimedia Communication and Technology (9 papers), Data Visualization and Analytics (8 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (8 papers), Video Analysis and Summarization (6 papers) and Information Systems Theories and Implementation (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (150 citations), Communication (81 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (65 citations), Conservation (29 citations) and Computer Science Applications (38 citations). Stan Ruecker has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Stéfan Sinclair, Ali Asghar Shiri, Lisa M. Given, Geoffrey Rockwell, Teresa M. Dobson, Ofer Arazy, Susan Wightman Brown, Eleni Stroulia, Peter Organisciak and Paras D. Mehta. Their work appears in journals such as She ji, Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Architectural Engineering and Design Management, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews and Canadian Theatre Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact