Stacy L. Smith

2.4k citations
28 papers · 1.5k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Stacy L. Smith

27 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Stacy L. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Gender Studies 463
  • Literature and Literary Theory 352
  • Microbiology 146
  • Social Psychology 296
  • Sociology and Political Science 583
Replace Kai J. Jonas with:
Kai J. Jonas Netherlands
Carol J. Pardun United States
Emily Moyer‐Gusé United States
Moon J. Lee United States
Robert A. Powell United States
Laura J. Gurak United States
Nathan Walter United States
Paula Saukko United Kingdom
Raymond W. Preiss United States
Tina M. Harris United States
Stacy L. Smith relative to Kai J. Jonas Netherlands Kai J. Jonas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12.2×
Kai J. Jonas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stacy L. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stacy L. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stacy L. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stacy L. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stacy L. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stacy L. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stacy L. Smith. The network helps show where Stacy L. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stacy L. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stacy L. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Stacy L. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004335
2 2009219
3 2003171
4 2002106
5 2007102
6 200171
7 201052
8 200250
9 200248
10 200646
11 200242
12 200529
13
Perps, Pimps, and Provocative Clothing: Examining Negative Content Patterns in Video Games.
200627
14 200627
15 200022
16 200519
17 200219
18 200514
19 201512
20 200412

About Stacy L. Smith

Stacy L. Smith is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Communication, having authored 28 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Media Influence and Health (15 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (9 papers), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (6 papers), Media Studies and Communication (5 papers), Digital Games and Media (4 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (3 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (3 papers) and Child Development and Digital Technology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (463 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (352 citations), Microbiology (146 citations), Social Psychology (296 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (583 citations). Stacy L. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Edward Downs, Barbara J. Wilson, Ron Tamborini, Kenneth A. Lachlan, Sandi W. Smith, Amber L. Ferris, Bradley S. Greenberg, Bradley P. Stoner, Michael Augenbraun and Clare Maxwell. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Communication, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, Sex Roles, Media Psychology and Communication Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact