Soopil Kim

431 citations
16 papers · 249 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Soopil Kim

13 papers receiving 249 citations

Peers

Soopil Kim
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Health Informatics 6
  • Artificial Intelligence 114
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 55
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 56
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 47
Replace Zhizhe Liu with:
Zhizhe Liu China
Philip Chikontwe South Korea
Mohamad Amin Bakhshali Iran
Zehra Karapınar Şentürk Türkiye
A. B. M. Aowlad Hossain Bangladesh
Zhongnian Li China
Hamidreza Bolhasani Iran
Ke Niu China
Maymouna Ezeddin Qatar
Soopil Kim relative to Zhizhe Liu China Zhizhe Liu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Zhizhe Liu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Soopil Kim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Soopil Kim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Soopil Kim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Soopil Kim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Soopil Kim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Soopil Kim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Soopil Kim. The network helps show where Soopil Kim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Soopil Kim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Soopil Kim Line = papers co-authored together Soopil Kim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 202133
2 202233
3 202031
4 202029
5 202328
6 202320
7 202418
8 202315
9 202411
10 202010
11 20248
12 20237
13 20226
14 20250
15 20250
16 20250

About Soopil Kim

Soopil Kim is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Cognitive Neuroscience and Signal Processing, having authored 16 papers that have together received 249 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data (4 papers), Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning (4 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (3 papers), Blind Source Separation Techniques (3 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (3 papers), Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning (2 papers), Medical Imaging and Analysis (2 papers) and Meningioma and schwannoma management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (6 citations), Artificial Intelligence (114 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (55 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (56 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (47 citations). Soopil Kim has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea and United States. Frequent co-authors include Sang Hyun Park, Philip Chikontwe, Kilian M. Pohl, Ehsan Adeli, Kyong Hwan Jin, Seung‐Koo Lee, Yae Won Park, Se Hoon Kim, Jong Hee Chang and Sung Soo Ahn. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Image Analysis, Pattern Recognition, European Radiology, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems and Information Fusion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact