Skylar E. Stolte

444 citations
12 papers · 271 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Skylar E. Stolte

10 papers receiving 263 citations

Peers

Skylar E. Stolte
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Ophthalmology 90
  • Health Informatics 11
  • Neurology 66
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 174
  • Health Information Management 29
Replace Xiang Fan with:
Xiang Fan China
Behzad Aliahmad Australia
Hamzeh Salameh Ahmad Shatnawi Saudi Arabia
Maria Inês Meyer Belgium
Gavin Weiguang Ding Canada
Ebrahim Mohammed Senan Saudi Arabia
Georgios Tagaris Greece
Ahmed ElTanboly United States
Amira Echtioui Tunisia
Parham Khojasteh Australia
Skylar E. Stolte relative to Xiang Fan China Xiang Fan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Xiang Fan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Skylar E. Stolte

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Skylar E. Stolte's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Skylar E. Stolte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Skylar E. Stolte more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Skylar E. Stolte

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Skylar E. Stolte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Skylar E. Stolte. The network helps show where Skylar E. Stolte may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Skylar E. Stolte, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Skylar E. Stolte Line = papers co-authored together Skylar E. Stolte links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 202097
2 202066
3 202053
4 201916
5 202414
6 20239
7 20228
8 20243
9 20243
10 20231
11 20001
12 20250

About Skylar E. Stolte

Skylar E. Stolte is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Neurology, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Cognitive Neuroscience and Ophthalmology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 271 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (3 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (3 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers), Brain Tumor Detection and Classification (2 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (2 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (2 papers), Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (2 papers) and Advanced Neural Network Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (90 citations), Health Informatics (11 citations), Neurology (66 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (174 citations) and Health Information Management (29 citations). Skylar E. Stolte has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Ruogu Fang, Jing Qin, Adam J. Woods, Alejandro Albizu, Aprinda Indahlastari, Bin Sheng, Huating Li, Weiping Jia, Dinggang Shen and Ling Dai. Their work appears in journals such as Brain stimulation, Medical Image Analysis, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, Frontiers in Neurology and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact