Simon T. Powers

42 papers receiving 825 citations

Peers

Simon T. Powers
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Safety Research 186
  • Health Informatics 15
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 123
  • Sociology and Political Science 425
  • Cultural Studies 56
Replace Rineke Verbrugge with:
Rineke Verbrugge Netherlands
Seth Bullock United Kingdom
Fernando P. Santos Portugal
The Anh Han United Kingdom
Markus Brede United Kingdom
Daniel Cownden United Kingdom
Massimo Stella Italy
Sergi Lozano Spain
Eric Klopfer United States
Lisa Singh United States
Simon T. Powers relative to Rineke Verbrugge Netherlands Rineke Verbrugge's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
Rineke Verbrugge · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Simon T. Powers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Simon T. Powers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Simon T. Powers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Simon T. Powers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Simon T. Powers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Simon T. Powers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Simon T. Powers. The network helps show where Simon T. Powers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Simon T. Powers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Simon T. Powers Line = papers co-authored together Simon T. Powers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200895
2 201883
3 201671
4 201470
5 202161
6 201155
7 201555
8 202154
9 201547
10 201337
11 201630
12 201223
13 201519
14 202118
15 202018
16 201815
17 202310
18 20188
19 20228
20 20238

About Simon T. Powers

Simon T. Powers is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Safety Research, Genetics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 46 papers that have together received 844 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (30 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (12 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (9 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (7 papers), Language and cultural evolution (5 papers), Plant and animal studies (5 papers), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (5 papers) and Transportation and Mobility Innovations (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (186 citations), Health Informatics (15 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (123 citations), Sociology and Political Science (425 citations) and Cultural Studies (56 citations). Simon T. Powers has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Laurent Lehmann, Jun He, Richard A. Watson, Cédric Perret, Carel P. van Schaik, Michael Guckert, The Anh Han, Alexandra S. Penn, Peter R. Lewis and Rob Mills. Their work appears in journals such as Artificial Life, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, Journal of Theoretical Biology and Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact