Simon Gompertz

1.3k citations
16 papers · 546 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Simon Gompertz

14 papers receiving 524 citations

Peers

Simon Gompertz
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Emergency Medical Services 87
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 366
  • Physiology 165
  • General Dentistry 6
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 3
Replace Janet G. Shaw with:
Janet G. Shaw Australia
Christopher McCrae United Kingdom
Stephen Rennard United States
Paolo Morelli Italy
Michelle Bourne United Kingdom
Vincent Gros France
Clair Barber United Kingdom
Heinrich C. Weber Australia
Masuo Nakamura Japan
Thomas W. Menard United States
Simon Gompertz relative to Janet G. Shaw Australia Janet G. Shaw's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Janet G. Shaw · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Simon Gompertz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Simon Gompertz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Simon Gompertz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Simon Gompertz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Simon Gompertz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Simon Gompertz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Simon Gompertz. The network helps show where Simon Gompertz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Simon Gompertz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Simon Gompertz Line = papers co-authored together Simon Gompertz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2001226
2 2001134
3 200275
4 200028
5 199025
6 201516
7 200513
8 201910
9 20157
10 20126
11 20182
12 19891
13 20091
14 20211
15 20151
16 20210

About Simon Gompertz

Simon Gompertz is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Physiology, Emergency Medical Services, Infectious Diseases and Ophthalmology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 546 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (10 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (3 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (2 papers), Pediatric health and respiratory diseases (2 papers), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (1 paper), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (1 paper), Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (1 paper) and Neonatal and Maternal Infections (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medical Services (87 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (366 citations), Physiology (165 citations), General Dentistry (6 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (3 citations). Simon Gompertz has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert A. Stockley, D Bayley, Claire O’Brien, S L Hill, Adam T. Hill, Peter Guest, Guy Hagan, Sebastian T. Lugg, Graham Burns and Alyn H. Morice. Their work appears in journals such as Thorax, Health Technology Assessment, European Respiratory Journal, BMJ Open Respiratory Research and Trials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact