Silke Siegert

727 citations
7 papers · 540 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Silke Siegert

7 papers receiving 516 citations

Peers

Silke Siegert
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 232
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 38
  • Economics and Econometrics 136
  • Global and Planetary Change 92
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 75
Replace Malte Siefert with:
Malte Siefert Germany
James B. Kadtke United States
John Gibson United States
Thomas Stemler Australia
M. A. H. Nerenberg Canada
Tyrus Berry United States
Gary M. Raymond United States
Arturo C. Martı́ Uruguay
Robert P. Black United States
Jaideep Pathak United States
Silke Siegert relative to Malte Siefert Germany Malte Siefert's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Malte Siefert · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Silke Siegert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Silke Siegert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Silke Siegert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Silke Siegert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Silke Siegert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Silke Siegert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Silke Siegert. The network helps show where Silke Siegert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Silke Siegert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Silke Siegert Line = papers co-authored together Silke Siegert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown

About Silke Siegert

Silke Siegert is a scholar working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Networks and Communications, Control and Systems Engineering and Computational Mechanics, having authored 7 papers that have together received 540 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chaos control and synchronization (2 papers), Statistical Mechanics and Entropy (2 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers), Complex Systems and Dynamics (1 paper), Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (1 paper), Combustion and flame dynamics (1 paper), Wind and Air Flow Studies (1 paper) and Fault Detection and Control Systems (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (232 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (38 citations), Economics and Econometrics (136 citations), Global and Planetary Change (92 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (75 citations). Silke Siegert has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include R. Friedrich, Joachim Peinke, Igor Grabec, Janez Gradišek, Mathias Lindemann, Günther Deuschl, G. Pfister, Malte Siefert, Jan Raethjen and Peter Hänggi. Their work appears in journals such as Physics Letters A, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Journal of Sound and Vibration, OPUS (Augsburg University) and Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact