Sheldon Gellar

485 citations
13 papers · 163 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Sheldon Gellar

9 papers receiving 111 citations

Peers

Sheldon Gellar
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Development 16
  • Anthropology 33
  • Political Science and International Relations 55
  • Sociology and Political Science 99
  • Demography 22
Replace David R. Smock with:
David R. Smock United States
Godfrey N. Uzoigwe United States
Ashraf Ghani Afghanistan
Kumar Rupesinghe Norway
Constance G. Anthony United States
Kenneth Ingham United Kingdom
Ken Post Netherlands
J.S. Birks United Kingdom
Rok Ajulu South Africa
Michael Newbury United States
Sheldon Gellar relative to David R. Smock United States David R. Smock's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
David R. Smock · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sheldon Gellar

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sheldon Gellar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sheldon Gellar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sheldon Gellar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sheldon Gellar

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sheldon Gellar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sheldon Gellar. The network helps show where Sheldon Gellar may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Sheldon Gellar, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sheldon Gellar Line = papers co-authored together Sheldon Gellar links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 198447
2 200632
3 200529
4 197923
5 198514
6
Conversations with Tocqueville : the global democratic revolution in the twenty-first century
20095
7 19774
8
Structural changes and colonial dependency : Senegal 1885-1945
19763
9
West African capital cities as motors for development
19673
10 19851
11 20201
12 19851
13 20140

About Sheldon Gellar

Sheldon Gellar is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Anthropology, Sociology and Political Science, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and General Social Sciences, having authored 13 papers that have together received 163 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (2 papers), Religion and Sociopolitical Dynamics in Nigeria (2 papers), African Studies and Geopolitics (2 papers), Rural development and sustainability (2 papers), African history and culture studies (2 papers), Organic Food and Agriculture (1 paper), Urban and Rural Development Challenges (1 paper) and Religion and Society Interactions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Development (16 citations), Anthropology (33 citations), Political Science and International Relations (55 citations), Sociology and Political Science (99 citations) and Demography (22 citations). Sheldon Gellar has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Eunice A. Charles, Michael Crowder, Aurelian Crăiuţu and Victor Azarya. Their work appears in journals such as The International Journal of African Historical Studies, Perspectives on Politics, Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue canadienne des études africaines, SAGE Publications eBooks and ASA Review of Books.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact