Scott Plous

31 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Scott Plous
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • General Decision Sciences 153
  • Small Animals 158
  • Social Psychology 423
  • Applied Psychology 88
  • Gender Studies 149
Replace Leila T. Worth with:
Leila T. Worth United States
Hugh LaFollette United States
Jim A. C. Everett United Kingdom
Robert F. Kidd United States
Nadira S. Faber United Kingdom
Leo Montada Germany
Joyce McCarl Nielsen United States
L. W. Sumner Canada
Charles Crawford Canada
Graham M. Vaughan New Zealand
Scott Plous relative to Leila T. Worth United States Leila T. Worth's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Leila T. Worth · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Plous

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Plous's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Plous with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Plous more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Plous

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Plous. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Plous. The network helps show where Scott Plous may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Scott Plous, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Plous Line = papers co-authored together Scott Plous links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993216
2
Understanding Prejudice and Discrimination
2002179
3 1989136
4 1991105
5 1994103
6 199187
7 199782
8 199568
9 199647
10 200146
11 199546
12 200038
13 198537
14 199637
15 199321
16 199320
17 199519
18 198717
19 200016
20 199516

About Scott Plous

Scott Plous is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Small Animals, Political Science and International Relations and Genetics, having authored 34 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human-Animal Interaction Studies (5 papers), Animal testing and alternatives (5 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (4 papers), Nuclear Issues and Defense (4 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (2 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (153 citations), Small Animals (158 citations), Social Psychology (423 citations), Applied Psychology (88 citations) and Gender Studies (149 citations). Scott Plous has collaborated with scholars based in United States and India. Frequent co-authors include J. Scott Armstrong, Harold Herzog, Philip G. Zimbardo, Jonathan A. White, Harold A. Herzog, Grant J. Rich, Uwe P. Gielen, Thomas R. Kratochwill and Philip C. Kendall. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Science, American Psychologist, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and Psychological Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact