Scott J. Primack

11 papers receiving 493 citations

Peers

Scott J. Primack
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 232
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 53
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 79
  • Surgery 191
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 27
Replace Paul E. Kaplan with:
Paul E. Kaplan United States
Jeffrey A. Strakowski United States
Müfit Akyüz Türkiye
Ju Kang Lee South Korea
Paula J. Micklesen United States
Eldon Loh Canada
Secher Denmark
Özlem Solak Türkiye
Eric Maupas France
Ken McGrattan New Zealand
Scott J. Primack relative to Paul E. Kaplan United States Paul E. Kaplan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16×
Paul E. Kaplan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott J. Primack

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott J. Primack's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott J. Primack with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott J. Primack more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott J. Primack

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott J. Primack. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott J. Primack. The network helps show where Scott J. Primack may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Scott J. Primack, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott J. Primack Line = papers co-authored together Scott J. Primack links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2012250
2 200766
3 201060
4 199542
5 199742
6 199520
7 201019
8 199913
9 19953
10 20161
11 20101
12 20071

About Scott J. Primack

Scott J. Primack is a scholar working on Surgery, Epidemiology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Rehabilitation, having authored 12 papers that have together received 518 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (6 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (6 papers), Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries (5 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (3 papers), Peripheral Nerve Disorders (2 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (1 paper), Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment (1 paper) and Emergency and Acute Care Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (232 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (53 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (79 citations), Surgery (191 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (27 citations). Scott J. Primack has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Paul Lento, Steven J. Shook, Katharine E. Alter, Michael S. Cartwright, Francis O. Walker, Lisa D. Hobson‐Webb, Christopher H. Hunt, Andrea J. Boon, T. Darrell Thomas and Robert A. Werner. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America, American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Muscle & Nerve, Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine and Spinal Cord.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact