Scott E. Forbush

2.8k citations
42 papers · 1.1k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Scott E. Forbush

36 papers receiving 842 citations

Peers

Scott E. Forbush
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 958
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 232
  • Atmospheric Science 177
  • Geophysics 125
  • Oceanography 80
Replace K. G. McCracken with:
K. G. McCracken United States
D. Venkatesan Canada
R. E. McGuire United States
K.‐P. Wenzel Netherlands
M. Storini Italy
P. H. Stoker South Africa
L. A. Fisk United States
L. J. Gleeson Australia
G. Wibberenz Germany
A. F. Timothy United States
Scott E. Forbush relative to K. G. McCracken United States K. G. McCracken's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
K. G. McCracken · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott E. Forbush

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott E. Forbush's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott E. Forbush with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott E. Forbush more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott E. Forbush

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott E. Forbush. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott E. Forbush. The network helps show where Scott E. Forbush may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Scott E. Forbush, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott E. Forbush Line = papers co-authored together Scott E. Forbush links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1954313
2 1958186
3
Equatorial electrojet in Peru
196185
4 196957
5 196256
6 195551
7 195538
8 196733
9 197324
10 196722
11 198321
12 196121
13 195220
14 198220
15 196618
16 197016
17 195715
18 199313
19 196012
20 199311

About Scott E. Forbush

Scott E. Forbush is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Artificial Intelligence, Oceanography and Radiation, having authored 42 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (32 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (15 papers), Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (12 papers), Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (7 papers), Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (6 papers), Radioactive Decay and Measurement Techniques (5 papers), Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics (5 papers) and Earthquake Detection and Analysis (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (958 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (232 citations), Atmospheric Science (177 citations), Geophysics (125 citations) and Oceanography (80 citations). Scott E. Forbush has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include D. Venkatesan, S. P. Duggal, E. H. Vestine, M. A. Pomerantz, G. Pizzella, J. A. Graham, H. V. Neher, C. H. Tsao, C. E. McIlwain and B. F. Burke. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Physical Review Letters, Reviews of Geophysics, Nature and Solar Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact