Scott Dick

3.7k citations
99 papers · 3.0k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

Scott Dick

98 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Peers

Scott Dick
Comparison fields: 5 of 154
  • Software 239
  • Management Science and Operations Research 711
  • Statistics and Probability 302
  • Artificial Intelligence 1.1k
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 424
Replace Marek Reformat with:
Marek Reformat Canada
Weiru Liu United Kingdom
Luciano Sánchez Spain
Lee W. Schruben United States
Klemens Böhm Germany
Robert Fourer United States
Keith Decker United States
Weibo Gong United States
John R. Woodward United Kingdom
Peter G. Harrison United Kingdom
Scott Dick relative to Marek Reformat Canada Marek Reformat's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Marek Reformat · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Dick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Dick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Dick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Dick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Dick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Dick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Dick. The network helps show where Scott Dick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott Dick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Dick Line = papers co-authored together Scott Dick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 99 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016250
2 2017177
3 2015152
4 2006145
5 2005144
6 2005143
7 2007133
8 2010126
9 201189
10 201081
11 201878
12 200970
13 200565
14 201958
15 201657
16 199957
17 200347
18 196444
19 200643
20 201242

About Scott Dick

Scott Dick is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 99 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fuzzy Logic and Control Systems (32 papers), Neural Networks and Applications (27 papers), Software Reliability and Analysis Research (10 papers), Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic (9 papers), Smart Grid Energy Management (9 papers), Software Engineering Research (9 papers), Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (9 papers) and Advanced Algebra and Logic (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (239 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (711 citations), Statistics and Probability (302 citations), Artificial Intelligence (1.1k citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (424 citations). Scott Dick has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Omolbanin Yazdanbakhsh, Wilsun Xu, Lukasz Kurgan, James Miller, Li Ding, James Miller, Abraham Kandel, Ronald R. Yager, Kanaka Durga Kedarisetti and Warren W. Wakarchuk. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, Information Sciences, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, International Journal of Intelligent Systems and International Journal of Approximate Reasoning.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact