Sarah Blott
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- John Woolliams (21 shared papers)Thomas Lewis (10 shared papers)J. L. Williams (3 shared papers)Chris Haley (3 shared papers)June Swinburne (11 shared papers)Magali SanCristobal (3 shared papers)Maxime Bonhomme (2 shared papers)Mark D. Vaudin (8 shared papers)
- Journals
- Animal Genetics (7 papers)The Veterinary Journal (7 papers)Genetics (5 papers)Animals (3 papers)PLoS ONE (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomBelgiumUnited States
In The Last Decade
Sarah Blott
63 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Equine 227
- Genetics 1.5k
- Small Animals 335
- Animal Science and Zoology 209
- Agronomy and Crop Science 207
Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Blott
This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Blott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Blott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Blott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Blott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Blott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Blott. The network helps show where Sarah Blott may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sarah Blott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 336 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 184 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 163 | |
| 4 | Proceedings, 10th World Congress of Genetics Applied to Livestock Production | 2014 | 109 |
| 5 | 2010 | 103 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 81 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 67 | |
| 8 | 1998 | 59 | |
| 9 | 1999 | 59 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 56 | |
| 11 | 2002 | 49 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 47 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 46 | |
| 14 | 2007 | 44 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 36 | |
| 16 | 2014 | 34 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 34 | |
| 18 | 2009 | 33 | |
| 19 | 2017 | 32 | |
| 20 | 2008 | 30 |
About Sarah Blott
Sarah Blott is a scholar working on Genetics, Equine, Small Animals, Animal Science and Zoology and Plant Science, having authored 64 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (28 papers), Veterinary Equine Medical Research (18 papers), Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (17 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (8 papers), Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology (8 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (6 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (4 papers) and Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (227 citations), Genetics (1.5k citations), Small Animals (335 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (209 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (207 citations). Sarah Blott has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Belgium and United States. Frequent co-authors include John Woolliams, Thomas Lewis, J. L. Williams, Chris Haley, June Swinburne, Magali SanCristobal, Maxime Bonhomme, Mark D. Vaudin, Jihad Abdallah and Bertrand Servin. Their work appears in journals such as Animal Genetics, The Veterinary Journal, Genetics, Animals and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.