Sarah Blacker

605 citations
3 papers · 14 · h-index 2

Impact in

    • Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
    • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
    • Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
    • Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
    • Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments
    • Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas

Papers in

    • Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments 1
    • Global Cancer Incidence and Screening 1
    • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research 1
    • Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries 1
    • Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment 1
    • Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes 1

Sarah Blacker

3 papers receiving 14 citations

Peers

Sarah Blacker
Comparison fields: 5 of 11
  • Oncology 11
  • Surgery 10
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 5
  • Rehabilitation 1
  • Emergency Medical Services 1
Replace N. F. M. Kok with:
N. F. M. Kok Netherlands
Temi Adedoyin United Kingdom
Mohammed Basendowah Saudi Arabia
Marta Paniagua García-Señoráns Spain
Kuok Chung Lee Singapore
Sana Kenshil Canada
S. Bianchini Italy
Izhaq Masih United Kingdom
Pawan Kirtani India
Wen-Hao Hu Taiwan
Sarah Blacker relative to N. F. M. Kok Netherlands N. F. M. Kok's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
N. F. M. Kok · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Blacker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Blacker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Blacker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Blacker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Blacker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Blacker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Blacker. The network helps show where Sarah Blacker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Sarah Blacker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sarah Blacker Line = papers co-authored together Sarah Blacker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

3 of 3 papers shown

About Sarah Blacker

Sarah Blacker is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery, Health Information Management, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Epidemiology, having authored 3 papers that have together received 14 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (1 paper), Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (1 paper), Medical Coding and Health Information (1 paper), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (1 paper), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (1 paper), Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (1 paper), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (1 paper) and Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (11 citations), Surgery (10 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (5 citations), Rehabilitation (1 citation) and Emergency Medical Services (1 citation). Sarah Blacker has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include N D Karanjia, Thomas A. Marks, Rajiv Lahiri, Adam E. Frampton, C. J. Walsh, Rajesh Kumar, Mary Phillips and Rebecca Jordache. Their work appears in journals such as Techniques in Coloproctology, European Journal of Surgical Oncology and Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact