Sandra Vanotti

35 papers receiving 621 citations

Peers

Sandra Vanotti
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 526
  • Applied Psychology 18
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 39
  • Family Practice 5
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 35
Replace Amanda R. O’Brien with:
Amanda R. O’Brien United States
Dana Serafin United States
Leigh E. Elkins United States
Marianna Vitková Slovakia
Nadine Akbar Canada
Laura Ricchiuti Italy
Wendy Morrison Canada
Dirk Bertens Netherlands
Gillian Q. Rush United States
Jana Poettgen Germany
Sandra Vanotti relative to Amanda R. O’Brien United States Amanda R. O’Brien's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×5×
Amanda R. O’Brien · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sandra Vanotti

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sandra Vanotti's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sandra Vanotti with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sandra Vanotti more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sandra Vanotti

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sandra Vanotti. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sandra Vanotti. The network helps show where Sandra Vanotti may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sandra Vanotti, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sandra Vanotti Line = papers co-authored together Sandra Vanotti links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006195
2 201345
3 201144
4 201642
5 201825
6 201723
7 201722
8 200821
9 201321
10 202019
11 202019
12 201418
13 201418
14 201717
15 201717
16 201912
17 201610
18 202110
19 20148
20 20228

About Sandra Vanotti

Sandra Vanotti is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology and Safety Research, having authored 40 papers that have together received 643 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (30 papers), Cognitive Functions and Memory (6 papers), Historical and Modern Theater Studies (4 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (3 papers), Psychological Testing and Assessment (2 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers), Disability Education and Employment (2 papers) and Medication Adherence and Compliance (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (526 citations), Applied Psychology (18 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (39 citations), Family Practice (5 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (35 citations). Sandra Vanotti has collaborated with scholars based in Argentina, United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Fernando Cáceres, Orlando Garcea, María Bárbara Eizaguirre, Jorge Sepulcre, Pablo Villoslada, Ralph H. B. Benedict, Evangelina Valeria Cores, Ricardo Nicolás Alonso, Andres Maria Villa and Audrey M. Smerbeck. Their work appears in journals such as Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, International Journal of MS Care, Neurology, The Clinical Neuropsychologist and Multiple Sclerosis Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact