Sandhya Mehta

34 papers receiving 369 citations

Peers

Sandhya Mehta
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 87
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 57
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 51
  • Language and Linguistics 28
  • Education 61
Replace Philip T. Rodgers with:
Philip T. Rodgers United States
A. P. D. Jansen Netherlands
Kristi W. Kelley United States
José Augusto Simões Portugal
Beatriz Rodríguez-Sánchez Spain
Mike Smet Belgium
Patrícia Melo Aguiar Brazil
Ellen J.I. van Dongen Netherlands
Kevin P. Boesen United States
Esther López Spain
Sandhya Mehta relative to Philip T. Rodgers United States Philip T. Rodgers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×28×
Philip T. Rodgers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sandhya Mehta

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sandhya Mehta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sandhya Mehta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sandhya Mehta more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sandhya Mehta

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sandhya Mehta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sandhya Mehta. The network helps show where Sandhya Mehta may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sandhya Mehta, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sandhya Mehta Line = papers co-authored together Sandhya Mehta links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201468
2 201045
3 201029
4 201729
5 201828
6 201224
7 201122
8 201422
9 201020
10 201519
11 20179
12 20128
13 20097
14
Assessing omani university entrants' critical thinking skills with the cornell class-reasoning test form x
20187
15 20096
16 20156
17 20236
18 20175
19 20205
20 20225

About Sandhya Mehta

Sandhya Mehta is a scholar working on Demography, Linguistics and Language, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Literature and Literary Theory and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 41 papers that have together received 392 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diaspora, migration, transnational identity (7 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (4 papers), Multilingual Education and Policy (3 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (3 papers), HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (3 papers), Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (3 papers) and Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (87 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (57 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (51 citations), Language and Linguistics (28 citations) and Education (61 citations). Sandhya Mehta has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Oman and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Rajender R. Aparasu, Rahma Al‐Mahrooqi, Hua Chen, Michael L. Johnson, Satabdi Chatterjee, Jeffrey T. Sherer, Effie L. Kuti, Stephen D. Sander, William K. Mountford and Sabyasachi Ghosh. Their work appears in journals such as Drugs & Aging, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, Journal of the American Pharmacists Association and Diaspora Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact