Sandeep Mathur

249 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Peers

Sandeep Mathur
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
  • Microbiology 30
  • Cancer Research 519
  • Oncology 926
  • Reproductive Medicine 192
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 358
Replace Fouad Al‐Dayel with:
Fouad Al‐Dayel Saudi Arabia
D. Vucicevic United States
Helmut Popper Austria
H. Barton Grossman United States
Ang Yuan Taiwan
Jean‐Pierre Bergerat France
James G. Kench Australia
Jingping Yuan China
Kelvin K. Ng Hong Kong
Liesbeth Peters-Bax Netherlands
Sandeep Mathur relative to Fouad Al‐Dayel Saudi Arabia Fouad Al‐Dayel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Fouad Al‐Dayel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sandeep Mathur

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sandeep Mathur's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sandeep Mathur with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sandeep Mathur more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sandeep Mathur

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sandeep Mathur. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sandeep Mathur. The network helps show where Sandeep Mathur may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sandeep Mathur, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sandeep Mathur Line = papers co-authored together Sandeep Mathur links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 270 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014134
2 2009131
3 200999
4 201587
5 200978
6 200669
7 201364
8 201863
9 201552
10 201346
11 202143
12 201642
13
Zingiber officinale attenuates retinal microvascular changes in diabetic rats via anti-inflammatory and antiangiogenic mechanisms.
201642
14 200841
15
Anti-tumor studies with extracts of Calotropis procera (Ait.) R.Br. root employing Hep2 cells and their possible mechanism of action.
200941
16 200939
17 201738
18 201337
19 201936
20 201034

About Sandeep Mathur

Sandeep Mathur is a scholar working on Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Cancer Research and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 270 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (45 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (25 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (22 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (16 papers), HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (14 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (13 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (13 papers) and Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (30 citations), Cancer Research (519 citations), Oncology (926 citations), Reproductive Medicine (192 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (358 citations). Sandeep Mathur has collaborated with scholars based in India, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Venkateswaran K. Iyer, Deepali Jain, Chandra Prakash Prasad, Ranju Ralhan, Gayatri Rath, Dinesh Bhatnagar, Rajinder Parshad, Rajani Mathur, Ajay Gogia and Neerja Bhatla. Their work appears in journals such as Cytopathology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Diagnostic Cytopathology, Acta Cytologica and Pediatric Surgery International.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact