Sandeep Mathur

253 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Peers

Sandeep Mathur
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
  • Microbiology 29
  • Cancer Research 434
  • Oncology 679
  • Reproductive Medicine 155
  • Molecular Medicine 92
Replace Fouad Al‐Dayel with:
Fouad Al‐Dayel Saudi Arabia
H. Barton Grossman United States
D. Vucicevic United States
Jean‐Pierre Bergerat France
James G. Kench Australia
Gregory T. MacLennan United States
Helmut Popper Austria
Young Whan Kim South Korea
Takayuki Ikezoe Japan
Dorothea Nagel Germany
Sandeep Mathur relative to Fouad Al‐Dayel Saudi Arabia Fouad Al‐Dayel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.1×
Fouad Al‐Dayel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sandeep Mathur

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sandeep Mathur's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sandeep Mathur with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sandeep Mathur more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sandeep Mathur

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sandeep Mathur. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sandeep Mathur. The network helps show where Sandeep Mathur may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sandeep Mathur, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sandeep Mathur Line = papers co-authored together Sandeep Mathur links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 276 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014146
2 2009145
3 2009100
4 201594
5 200981
6 200680
7 201368
8 201866
9 201555
10 201353
11 202150
12
Zingiber officinale attenuates retinal microvascular changes in diabetic rats via anti-inflammatory and antiangiogenic mechanisms.
201644
13 201643
14
Anti-tumor studies with extracts of Calotropis procera (Ait.) R.Br. root employing Hep2 cells and their possible mechanism of action.
200943
15 201742
16 200842
17 201041
18 200939
19 201337
20 201736

About Sandeep Mathur

Sandeep Mathur is a scholar working on Oncology, Cancer Research, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery and Epidemiology, having authored 276 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (36 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (17 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (15 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (12 papers), Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (12 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (11 papers), Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (11 papers) and Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (29 citations), Cancer Research (434 citations), Oncology (679 citations), Reproductive Medicine (155 citations) and Molecular Medicine (92 citations). Sandeep Mathur has collaborated with scholars based in India, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Venkateswaran K. Iyer, Deepali Jain, Chandra Prakash Prasad, Ranju Ralhan, Dinesh Bhatnagar, Gayatri Rath, Rajinder Parshad, Rajani Mathur, Ajay Gogia and Neerja Bhatla. Their work appears in journals such as Cytopathology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Diagnostic Cytopathology, Acta Cytologica and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact