Samuel Bagg
Impact in
-
- Political Philosophy and Ethics
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Policy and Reform Studies
- Populism, Right-Wing Movements
- Political Theory and Influence
- Philosophy top 5%
Papers in
-
- Political Philosophy and Ethics 17
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation 3
- Populism, Right-Wing Movements 3
-
- Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies 4
- Critical Theory and Philosophy 3
- Foucault, Power, and Ethics 3
Samuel Bagg
22 papers receiving 213 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
- Political Science and International Relations 209
- Philosophy 49
- Communication 25
- Public Administration 11
- Sociology and Political Science 117
Countries citing papers authored by Samuel Bagg
This map shows the geographic impact of Samuel Bagg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Samuel Bagg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Samuel Bagg more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Samuel Bagg
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Samuel Bagg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Samuel Bagg. The network helps show where Samuel Bagg may publish in the future.
No co-authors to show.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 60 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 36 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 28 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 17 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 17 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 15 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 15 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 11 | |
| 11 | Can Deliberation Neutralize Power | 2015 | 8 |
| 12 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 14 | Between Critical and Normative Theory: Predictive Political Theory as a Deweyan Realism | 2016 | 7 |
| 15 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 17 | The Power of the Multitude: Answering Epistemic Challenges to Democracy | 2018 | 2 |
| 18 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 19 | Beyond the Search for the Subject: An Anti-Essentialist Ontology for Liberal Democracy | 2018 | 1 |
| 20 | 2021 | 1 |
About Samuel Bagg
Samuel Bagg is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Communication and Strategy and Management, having authored 27 papers that have together received 274 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Philosophy and Ethics (17 papers), Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies (4 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (3 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (3 papers), Critical Theory and Philosophy (3 papers), Foucault, Power, and Ethics (3 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (2 papers) and Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (209 citations), Philosophy (49 citations), Communication (25 citations), Public Administration (11 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (117 citations). Samuel Bagg has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Political Theory, American Political Science Review, Politics & Society, Political Research Quarterly and Politics Philosophy & Economics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.