Sam Crawford

521 citations
11 papers · 141 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Sam Crawford

11 papers receiving 132 citations

Peers

Sam Crawford
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
  • Computer Networks and Communications 117
  • Media Technology 17
  • Information Systems 31
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 24
  • Artificial Intelligence 25
Replace Mehmet Ulema with:
Mehmet Ulema United States
Dan Forsberg Finland
Mirja Kühlewind Switzerland
Henrik Abramowicz Germany
Andrea Soppera United Kingdom
Norbert Niebert Sweden
Alisa Devlić Sweden
Sumaya N. Al-Khatib Jordan
Ashraf Masood Pakistan
Doron Zarchy United States
Sam Crawford relative to Mehmet Ulema United States Mehmet Ulema's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Mehmet Ulema · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sam Crawford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sam Crawford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sam Crawford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sam Crawford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sam Crawford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sam Crawford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sam Crawford. The network helps show where Sam Crawford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Sam Crawford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sam Crawford Line = papers co-authored together Sam Crawford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 201156
2 201234
3 201312
4 202012
5 20167
6 20146
7 20134
8
A framework for large-scale measurements
20133
9
A registry for commonly used metrics. Independent registries
20133
10 20233
11
A registry for commonly used metrics
20131

About Sam Crawford

Sam Crawford is a scholar working on Computer Networks and Communications, Artificial Intelligence, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Information Systems and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 11 papers that have together received 141 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Network Traffic and Congestion Control (5 papers), Caching and Content Delivery (4 papers), Advanced Optical Network Technologies (2 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (2 papers), Mobile Agent-Based Network Management (2 papers), Software-Defined Networks and 5G (2 papers), Wireless Networks and Protocols (2 papers) and Complex Network Analysis Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Networks and Communications (117 citations), Media Technology (17 citations), Information Systems (31 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (24 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (25 citations). Sam Crawford has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and France. Frequent co-authors include Nick Feamster, Srikanth Sundaresan, Renata Teixeira, Antonio Pescapè, Walter de Donato, Vaibhav Bajpai, Nazanin Magharei, Jürgen Schönwälder, Philip Eardley and Marcelo Bagnulo. Their work appears in journals such as Communications of the ACM, ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, IEEE Communications Magazine and Future Network & Mobile Summit.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact