S. Schaffert

1.2k citations
12 papers · 423 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

S. Schaffert

11 papers receiving 412 citations

Peers

S. Schaffert
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
  • Structural Biology 77
  • Radiation 127
  • Condensed Matter Physics 163
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 334
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 119
Replace Jan Geilhufe with:
Jan Geilhufe Germany
A. Kobs Germany
Lars Bocklage Germany
Samuel Flewett Chile
R. Rick United States
Sina Mayr Switzerland
Dennis Rudolf Germany
Matthias Noske Germany
E. Völkl Germany
Andrea Eschenlohr Germany
S. Schaffert relative to Jan Geilhufe Germany Jan Geilhufe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jan Geilhufe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by S. Schaffert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S. Schaffert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. Schaffert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. Schaffert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S. Schaffert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. Schaffert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. Schaffert. The network helps show where S. Schaffert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside S. Schaffert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with S. Schaffert Line = papers co-authored together S. Schaffert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2015258
2 201429
3 201324
4 201021
5 201518
6 201315
7 201015
8 201214
9 201213
10 201410
11 20176
12 20130

About S. Schaffert

S. Schaffert is a scholar working on Radiation, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Structural Biology, Condensed Matter Physics and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, having authored 12 papers that have together received 423 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques (9 papers), Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (5 papers), Digital Holography and Microscopy (3 papers), Crystallography and Radiation Phenomena (2 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (2 papers), Magnetic Properties and Applications (1 paper) and Theoretical and Computational Physics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Structural Biology (77 citations), Radiation (127 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (163 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (334 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (119 citations). S. Schaffert has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Stefan Eisebitt, Bastian Pfau, C. Günther, Jan Geilhufe, Clemens von Korff Schmising, Michael Schneider, Mathias Kläui, Felix Büttner, J. Mohanty and T. Schulz. Their work appears in journals such as New Journal of Physics, Optics Express, Review of Scientific Instruments, Nature Communications and Journal of Physics Condensed Matter.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact