Ryan Jock

403 citations
11 papers · 253 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Ryan Jock

11 papers receiving 250 citations

Peers

Ryan Jock
Comparison fields: 5 of 22
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 218
  • Condensed Matter Physics 44
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 157
  • Artificial Intelligence 45
  • Materials Chemistry 45
Replace P. I. Arseyev with:
P. I. Arseyev Russia
Josip Kukučka Austria
Hannes Watzinger Austria
Alberto Tosato Netherlands
O. A. Tkachenko Russia
N. C. Bishop United States
T. Chwiej Poland
В. А. Ткаченко Russia
A. Pfund Switzerland
L. Bourdet France
Ryan Jock relative to P. I. Arseyev Russia P. I. Arseyev's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
P. I. Arseyev · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ryan Jock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ryan Jock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ryan Jock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ryan Jock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ryan Jock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ryan Jock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ryan Jock. The network helps show where Ryan Jock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ryan Jock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ryan Jock Line = papers co-authored together Ryan Jock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 201871
2 201948
3 201530
4 200929
5 202228
6 201921
7 200911
8 201310
9 20253
10
Comparing SiGe HBT Amplifier Circuits for Fast Single-shot Spin Readout
20171
11
Spin Dynamics of Electrons Confined in Silicon Heterostructures
20151

About Ryan Jock

Ryan Jock is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Artificial Intelligence and Mechanics of Materials, having authored 11 papers that have together received 253 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum and electron transport phenomena (8 papers), GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials (3 papers), Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design (3 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (3 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (2 papers), Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (2 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (2 papers) and Semiconductor materials and interfaces (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (218 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (44 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (157 citations), Artificial Intelligence (45 citations) and Materials Chemistry (45 citations). Ryan Jock has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Daniel R. Ward, Malcolm S. Carroll, N. Tobias Jacobson, Patrick Harvey-Collard, Andrew Mounce, John M. Anderson, Vanita Srinivasa, Tammy Pluym, Joel R. Wendt and Çağlıyan Kurdak. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, Applied Physics Letters, Physical Review Letters, Physical Review B and npj Quantum Information.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact