Ryad Chellali

61 papers receiving 772 citations

Peers

Ryad Chellali
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Human-Computer Interaction 124
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 293
  • Media Technology 63
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 127
  • Automotive Engineering 81
Replace Ana-Maria Creţu with:
Ana-Maria Creţu Canada
Minoru Fukumi Japan
Ryo Suzuki United States
Dzmitry Tsetserukou Russia
Adrian Burlacu Romania
Chunquan Li China
Nick Pears United Kingdom
Xiaogang Jin China
Masayuki Kanbara Japan
Hang-Bong Kang South Korea
Ryad Chellali relative to Ana-Maria Creţu Canada Ana-Maria Creţu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Ana-Maria Creţu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ryad Chellali

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ryad Chellali's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ryad Chellali with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ryad Chellali more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ryad Chellali

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ryad Chellali. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ryad Chellali. The network helps show where Ryad Chellali may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ryad Chellali, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ryad Chellali Line = papers co-authored together Ryad Chellali links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201582
2 201877
3 201660
4 201547
5 199843
6 201142
7 201840
8 201637
9 201431
10 200230
11
Depth Perception Within Virtual Environments: Comparison Between two Display Technologies
201023
12 201623
13 200922
14 201019
15 201019
16 200518
17 201510
18 201110
19 20178
20 20138

About Ryad Chellali

Ryad Chellali is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Control and Systems Engineering, Human-Computer Interaction, Cognitive Neuroscience and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 69 papers that have together received 793 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization (14 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (9 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (8 papers), Robotic Path Planning Algorithms (8 papers), Teleoperation and Haptic Systems (8 papers), Human Pose and Action Recognition (7 papers), Robot Manipulation and Learning (7 papers) and Underwater Vehicles and Communication Systems (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (124 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (293 citations), Media Technology (63 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (127 citations) and Automotive Engineering (81 citations). Ryad Chellali has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, France and China. Frequent co-authors include Abdeldjallil Naceri, Ben Beklisi Kwame Ayawli, Albert Yaw Appiah, Frimpong Kyeremeh, Khelifa Baizid, Vittorio Murino, Sadegh Mohammadi, Alessandro Perina, Hossein Mousavi and Jamshed Iqbal. Their work appears in journals such as Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, PRESENCE Virtual and Augmented Reality, International Journal of Social Robotics, Scientific Reports and The Visual Computer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact